Aim:
To compare speech intelligibility (SI), nasal resonance, and swallowing ability in maxillectomy patients with a customized obturator to the conventional obturator.
Settings and Design:
Non-randomized controlled study.
Materials and Methods:
Forty-eight maxillectomy patients were recruited and assessment of SI, nasal resonance, and swallowing ability was done at three situations: without obturator, with conventional obturator, and with customized obturator. Recordings of unrehearsed conversation, counting from number 1–20 and four sets of Chapel Hill Multilingual Intelligibility Test in the Hindi language were used to assess SI and nasal resonance. SI was evaluated by untrained listeners and graded according to a 6-point scale. Nasal resonance was evaluated by speech pathologists on a 7-point scale of severity. Swallowing ability was evaluated by water drinking test.
Statistical Analysis Used:
One-way ANOVA,
Post hoc
Bonferroni and Chi square test.
Results:
SI and nasal resonance showed a statistically significant difference between any two groups (
P
< 0.001). Water drinking time was significantly different between without obturator and with customized obturator (
P
< 0.001), but the difference was not statistically significant between without obturator and with obturator (
P
< 0.004).
Conclusion:
SI, nasal resonance, and swallowing ability improved with customized obturator in comparison to the conventional obturator.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.