No abstract

The febrile neutropenia (FN) rates reported with the docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) (TC) regimen given every 3 weeks vary from 4 to 69 % in early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. This creates uncertainty as to whether patients receiving the TC regimen should also receive granulocyte colony-stimulating factor primary prophylaxis (G-CSFpp), which is recommended when chemotherapy regimens have ≥20 % FN rate. We conducted a meta-analysis of published studies to determine FN rate with the TC regimen, its dependence on patients' age, and the efficacy of G-CSFpp in reducing it in ESBC patients. We systematically searched the literature via PUBMED using the following terms: 'docetaxel', 'cyclophosphamide', 'febrile neutropenia', and 'breast cancer'. Inclusion criteria were full text peer-reviewed clinical studies in English reporting FN rates with TC regimen in relationship to G-CSFpp. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used for all statistical analyses. Eight studies (N = 1542 patients) were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled mean FN rate was 23.2 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 6.9-55.2 %; Q = 218.17, I (2) = 97.7). The FN risk in <65 years old patients was lower by 67.7 % compared to that in patients ≥65 years old (pooled odds ratio (OR) 0.323; 95 % CI 0.127-0.820; P = 0.017). The FN risk was reduced by 92.3 % with G-CSFpp (pooled OR 0.077; 95 % CI 0.013-0.460; P = 0.005). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that TC regimen was associated with ≥20 % FN risk, which was significantly higher in patients ≥65 years old and improved with G-CSFpp. G-CSFpp should be considered for all ESBC patients receiving TC regimen, especially those ≥65 years old.

Differences were found by physician type in care of children with ADHD. Additional studies are needed to understand clinical consequences of these differences and the implications for care coordination across provider specialties.

BACKGROUND: Psychotropic polypharmacy is a concern in the management of pediatric mental disorders due to the lack of pediatric data to support the practice. Although seeing multiple providers has been identified as an important predictor of polypharmacy, no study has yet assessed the effect of care coordination between providers on receipt of psychotropic polypharmacy. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between the intensity of care coordination within a patient's care team and the likelihood of the patient receiving multiclass psychotropic polypharmacy.METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using the 2013-2015 administrative claims data from a Medicaid managed care organization (Texas Children's Health Plan). Children and adolescents aged 18 years or younger with a diagnosis of a mental/behavioral disorder and receipt of psychotropic prescriptions from multiple prescribers were included in the study. Psychotropic polypharmacy was defined as the receipt of 2 or more psychotropic medications from different drug classes concurrently for 60 days or more. Care coordination was measured using social network analysis (SNA), a new technique included in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Care Coordination Measures Atlas. Care density, an SNA surrogate for care coordination, was calculated as the ratio of the sum of patients shared by physician pairs within a patient's care team to the total number of physician pairs. The Andersen behavioral model was used to guide multivariate logistic regression analyses conducted to assess the association between care density and the likelihood of patients receiving psychotropic polypharmacy after controlling for predisposing and need factors. RESULTS: A total of 24,147 children and adolescents diagnosed with a mental/ behavioral disorder were identified. About 34.0% (n = 8,092) of these individuals received psychotropic medications from multiple prescribers who were either primary care physicians (PCPs) or specialists. Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between care density and the use of psychotropic polypharmacy. However, the direction of this relationship varied depending on the composition of the patient's care team. Among patients with only PCPs involved in their care team, patients in the higher care-density group were 28% less likely to receive psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.62-0.96) than those in the lower care-density group. In contrast, among patients who had both PCPs and specialists involved in their care team, those in the higher care-density group were 2 times more likely to experience psychotropic polypharmacy (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.68-2.40). Care density was not significantly associated with the receipt of psychotropic polypharmacy in the specialist-only group.CONCLUSIONS: This study found significant associations between care density and prescription of psychotropic polypharmacy. This relationship varied depending on the patient's diagnosis, disease complexity, and composition of the patient's care team.

Background:Most multiple myeloma (MM) patients ultimately progress, with remission duration decreasing after first relapse. Recently, novel agents have been approved for the treatment of relapsed MM. There is a paucity of real-world data on these treatments. We sought to compare time to next treatment (TTNT) in MM patients in their second line of therapy (LOT2), treated with common proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based triplets.Methods:Adult MM patients who received carfilzomib (K) between 1 November 2013 and 29 February 2016 at US Oncology Network (USON) clinics utilizing iKnowMed™ electronic health records (EHRs) were identified. Patients were included if they were ⩾18 years of age, not enrolled in clinical trials, had ⩾2 visits at a USON clinic and received LOT2 regimens consisting of: K+lenalidomide with steroid (KRd), bortezomib+lenalidomide with steroid (VRd), or bortezomib+cyclophosphamide with steroid (VCyd). TTNT was estimated from LOT2 initiation to LOT3 initiation using the Kaplan–Meier method, and hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox modeling.Results:A total of 718 patients received a K-containing regimen sometime during their MM treatment (LOT1 to LOT5). Of these, 156 patients received: KRd (n = 112; 71.8%), VRd (n =27; 17.3%), or VCyd (n = 17; 10.9%). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups (mean age: 64.8 years; 58% male). Median TTNT was longest for KRd [25.3 months; 95% confidence interval (CI): 19.71–NR], versus VRd or VCyd (VRd median TTNT: 10.2 months, 95% CI: 4.24–12.71; VCyd: 6.5 months, 95% CI: 3.02–12.78; log-rank p < 0.0001). The adjusted HR for KRd was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.11–0.37), compared with VRd.Conclusions:Considering the real-world nature of these data, the median TTNT observed with KRd was relatively consistent, with progression-free survival (PFS) for KRd observed in the phase III ASPIRE trial (median PFS: ITT population = 26.3 months; LOT2 = 29.6 months). Patients who received KRd at first relapse had significantly longer TTNT, compared with those on VRd or VCyd, confirming the value of KRd as an important treatment option for relapsed MM.