This is the largest review to date of THA in patients aged 30 or less. The results show significant functional improvement measured by Harris Hip Score. The revision rate of 5% at 8.4 years is comparable to the general THA population. This contrasts high revision rates reported in older reviews of the literature, suggesting adoption of improved techniques and implants in the more recent literature.
PurposeTo investigate long-term visual acuity (VA) outcomes and complication rates in vitrectomised eyes undergoing anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) insertion.Patients and methodsA single-centre, retrospective case series including all patients who had undergone ACIOL placement at the time of vitrectomy surgery or having had previous vitrectomy, between January 2007 and January 2013. Patients were identified using an electronic database and paper casefile notes were analysed for all patients. Patients were excluded if they had <3 months follow-up.ResultsTwo hundred and seventy-one patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 27 months. One hundred and forty-eight patients were vitrectomised before ACIOL placement. One hundred and twenty-three patients underwent vitrectomy at the time of ACIOL placement. Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before ACIOL placement was 1.27 LogMar (SD 0.95). Mean BCVA at final follow-up was 0.51 LogMar (SD 0.66) (paired-sample T-test P<0.001). Forty (15%) patients developed postoperative cystoid macular oedema (CMO). Eighty-seven (32%) patients had an intraocular pressure (IOP) rise acutely post ACIOL insertion. Fifteen (6%) patients developed corneal decompensation. Five subsequently required corneal grafting. Sixteen patients had ACIOL displacement or instability requiring further surgery.ConclusionsACIOL insertion after vitrectomy is effective. Ninety-two per cent of patients maintained or gained VA, comparable to previous studies of ACIOL insertion post complicated cataract surgery. Raised IOP was the most frequent complication: 61 patients were on topical therapy at most recent follow-up. CMO tended to be acute. Corneal decompensation was infrequent.
The visual acuities of 17 young emmetropes and corrected ametropes were measured over the range of 7.5-0.19 m using a Bailey-Lovie chart. Accommodation stimulus-response measures were also taken over this range using retinoscopy to establish whether variations in visual acuity with observation distance could be attributed to accommodation behaviour. Tonic accommodation was recorded using the Canon R1 autorefractor and was compared with visual acuity and stimulus-response results. In general, visual acuity was found to be dependent on stimulus distance, being significantly reduced for most observers for the closest targets. There were three categories of observer performance for visual acuity as a function of observation distance; one group showing no change in visual acuity with distance, a second showing a flat function for distances 7.55-0.5 m, and then a decrease in visual acuity for shorter distances; and a third category that showed a maximum visual acuity in the 1.2-1.6 m region. This behaviour was unrelated to individual stimulus-response characteristics and there was no significant relationship between tonic accommodation and the distance where acuity was best for the third category observers.
CRANS represents a previously undescribed clinical entity. CRANS may be responsible for some CPAP-related eye side effects and possibly for rarer secondary eye complications, including conjunctivitis and corneal ulceration. CRANS should be suspected in any patient on CPAP complaining of eye symptoms. CRANS may be diagnosed through careful observation during A-PSG and confirmed by performing a "saline bubble test." Management options include nonsurgical (mask alternatives, humidification, nasopharyngeal airway) and surgical techniques (nasal airway surgery, inferior turbinate out-fracture and adhesion, injection of bulking agent around Hasner's valve).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.