The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, and coronary heart disease refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are five different LDL-apheresis systems available: cascade filtration or lipid filtration, immunoadsorption, heparin-induced LDL precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption, and the LDL hemoperfusion. There is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. Besides the elimination of other risk factors, in severe hyperlipidemia therapeutic strategies should focus on a drastic reduction of serum lipoproteins. Despite maximum conventional therapy with a combination of different kinds of lipid-lowering drugs, sometimes the goal of therapy cannot be reached. Hence, in such patients, treatment with LDL-apheresis is indicated. Technical and clinical aspects of these five different LDL-apheresis methods are shown here. There were no significant differences with respect to or concerning all cholesterols, or triglycerides observed. With respect to elevated lipoprotein (a) levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be most effective. The different published data clearly demonstrate that treatment with LDL-apheresis in patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia refractory to maximum conservative therapy is effective and safe in long-term application.

Atherosclerosis with myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral cellular disease still maintains its position at the top of morbidity and mortality statistics in industrialized nations. Established risk factors widely accepted are smoking, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and central obesity. Furthermore, there is a strong correlation between hyperlipidemia and atherosclerosis. The prognosis of patients suffering from severe hyperlipidemia, sometimes combined with elevated lipoprotein (a) (Lpa) levels, and coronary heart disease (CHD) refractory to diet and lipid-lowering drugs is poor. For such patients, regular treatment with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is the therapeutic option. Today, there are four different LDL apheresis systems available: immunoadsorption, heparin-induced extracorporeal LDL/fibrinogen precipitation, dextran sulfate LDL adsorption and LDL hemoperfusion. Regarding the different LDL apheresis systems used, there is no significant difference with respect to the clinical outcome or concerning total cholesterol, LDL, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), or triglyceride concentrations. With respect to elevated Lpa levels, however, the immunoadsorption method seems to be the most effective. In 45 patients (25 women, 20 men) suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to diet and lipid lowering drugs, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis was performed over 95.6 +/- 44.7 months. Four different systems (Liposorber, 32 of 45, Kaneka, Osaka, Japan; Therasorb, 6 of 45, Baxter, Munich, Germany; Lipopak, 2 of 45, Pocard, Moscow, Russia; and Dali, 5 of 45, Fresenius, St. Wendel, Germany) were used. With all methods, average reductions of 57% for total cholesterol, 55.9% for LDL, 75.8% for lipoprotein a (Lpa), and 45.9% for triglycerides, and an average increase of 14.3% for HDL were reached. Severe side-effects such as shock or allergic reactions were very rare (0.3%) in all methods. In the course of treatment, an improvement in general well-being and increased performance were experienced by 44 of 45 patients. The present data demonstrate that treatment with LDL apheresis of patients suffering from familial hypercholesterolemia resistant to maximum conservative therapy is very effective and safe even in long-term application.

Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is an extracorporeal modality to lower LDL cholesterol. While most of the devices eliminate LDL particles from plasma, a recently introduced whole-blood perfusion column (DALI) adsorbs lipoproteins directly from whole blood. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a new whole-blood LDL apheresis system (Liposorber D) in 10 patients with severe hypercholesterolemia in a multicenter trial. In 93 LDL aphereses, the mean reduction in LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) was 62.2 +/- 11.5% and 55.6 +/- 16.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). If hemodilution during apheresis was considered, the reductions were 58.0 +/- 10.9 and 55.3 +/- 10.9%, respectively (P < 0.01), while high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not change significantly. Three mild episodes of hypocalcemia and two mild episodes of arterial hypotension were observed; however, LDL apheresis could be continued in each case. In conclusion, the new whole-blood LDL apheresis with Liposorber D is a safe, simple, and useful modality to reduce LDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular high-risk patients.

Since the introduction of large-bore catheters for acute hemodialysis 30 years ago, many problems with handling, material, and contamination of these catheters exist. Nevertheless, catheterization of the inferior and superior vena cava with a large-bore catheter has proved to be suitable as a rapid connection process for hemodialysis, hemofiltration, hemoperfusion, plasmapheresis, plasmaperfusion, among others. In a retrospective study with 2,741 large-bore catheters in 1,716 patients, the frequency of infections, thrombosis, bleeding, and other side effects was investigated. All complications and side effects are presented dependent on vascular access route. In total, the complication rate was 48.9% higher in subclavian puncture than in internal jugular puncture (24.8%). The highest complication rates for both vascular access routes were infections or septicemia; infections were observed in 19.5% of subclavian catheters versus 10% of internal jugular catheters.

Hypercholesterolemia can be adequately controlled by appropriate diet and maximum lipid lowering drug therapy in most patients. Nevertheless, there exists a group of patients, including those with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), who remain at high risk for the development or progression of premature coronary heart disease (CHD). For these patients additional measures such as surgery and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis have to be considered. The objective of this multicenter trial, which included 30 clinical centers (28 in Germany and one each in Scotland and Luxembourg), was to determine if repeated LDL apheresis using the Liposorber LA-15 system (Kaneka Corporation, Osaka, Japan) could lead to an additional acute and time averaged lowering of total cholesterol (TC) and LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) in severely hypercholesterolemic patients whose cholesterol levels could not be controlled by appropriate diet and maximum drug therapy. A total of 6,798 treatments were performed on 120 patients, including 8 with homozygous FH, 75 with heterozygous FH, and 37 with unclassified FH or other hyperlipidemias from 1988 through 1994. The mean TC and mean LDL-C levels at baseline were 410.0 mg/dl and 333.9 mg/dl, respectively. LDL apheresis was performed once a week or at least once every 2 weeks in all patients. During treatment with the Liposorber system the mean acute percentage reduction was 52.6% for TC and 63.1% for LDL-C. Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) were also substantially reduced to 60.6% and 47.5%, respectively. Fibrinogen, a potential risk factor for CHD, was reduced by 26.2%. In contrast, the mean acute reduction of high density lipoprotein (HDL) was only 3.4%. During the course of the treatment, the time averaged levels of TC and LDL-C were reduced by approximately 39% and 50%, respectively, compared to baseline levels. The adverse events (AEs) were those generally associated with extracorporeal treatments. The most common AE was hypotension, with 69 episodes corresponding to 1% of all treatments reported in 44 of the 120 patients treated. All other kinds of AEs occurred in less than 0.2% of the treatments. The treatment with the Liposorber LA-15 system was overall well tolerated. It should be noted, however, that a more severe type of hypotensive reaction associated with flush, bradycardia, and dyspnea was reported in patients taking concomitant angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor medication. Except for such anaphylactoid-like reactions associated with the intake of ACE inhibitors, the Liposorber LA-15 system represents a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients suffering from severe hypercholesterolemia that could not be adequately controlled by diet and maximum drug therapy.