The aim of this prospective controlled randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the additional effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in attachment gain. Twenty-two patients showing contralateral intrabony defects were included. Defects were randomized to beta-TCP (Cerasorb) in combination with PRP (test) or alone (control). Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and relative AL (RAL) were assessed at the first, initial, re-evaluation (or basis examinations) and 6 months after surgery. Defect dimensions were recorded at baseline surgery (day 0) and during re-entry surgery (after 6 months), with vertical depth of the defect as primary outcome variable. An early healing index (EHI) was assessed 3 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. Both treatments led to clinical improvements. The median reduction of open vertical depth was 1.9 mm (interquartile intervals, 0.75 and 2.5 mm) at test sites, compared with 2.6 mm (1.8 and 3.5 mm) at control sites (p = 0.19, Wilcoxon). The median reductions of PPD and CAL at the four sites in close proximity to the defect in the interproximal area at test sites were 0.8 and 0.28 mm, and at control sites 0.4 and 0.13 mm, respectively. The EHI showed a reduction from grade 3 after 3 days to grade 1 after 4 weeks. PRP did not improve the results achieved with beta-TCP in the treatment of intrabony defects.
These data provided an indication of a possible effect of patient factors on the outcome of regenerative treatment of buccal mandibular class II furcation defects.
Topical use of PRP did not improve maxillary bone volume either clinically relevant or statistically significant compared to that in conventionally treated patients. The use of PRP to support bone regeneration cannot be recommended as a standard method for maxillary augmentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.