CD40/CD40L signaling promotes both B cell and CTL responses in vivo, the latter being beneficial in tumor models. Because CTL may also limit autoreactive B cell expansion in lupus, we asked whether an agonist CD40 mAb would exacerbate lupus due to B cell stimulation or would improve lupus due to CTL promotion. These studies used an induced model of lupus, the parent-into-F1 model in which transfer of DBA/2 splenocytes into B6D2F1 mice induces chronic lupus-like graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Although agonist CD40 mAb treatment of DBA→F1 mice initially exacerbated B cell expansion, it also strongly promoted donor CD8 T cell engraftment and cytolytic activity such that by 10 days host B cells were eliminated consistent with an accelerated acute GVHD. CD40 stimulation bypassed the requirement for CD4 T cell help for CD8 CTL possibly by licensing dendritic cells (DC) as shown by the following: 1) greater initial activation of donor CD8 T cells, but not CD4 T cells; 2) earlier activation of host DC; 3) host DC expansion that was CD8 dependent and CD4 independent; and 4) induction of acute GVHD using CD4-depleted purified DBA CD8+ T cells. A single dose of CD40 mAb improved lupus-like renal disease at 12 wk, but may not suffice for longer periods consistent with a need for continuing CD8 CTL surveillance. These results demonstrate that in the setting of lupus-like CD4 T cell-driven B cell hyperactivity, CTL promotion is both feasible and beneficial and the CTL-promoting properties of CD40 stimulation outweigh the B cell-stimulatory properties.

Although IFN-γ is the archetypal Th1 cytokine, its role in CTL maturation is uncertain. We used an in vivo mouse model of CTL development, parent-into-F1 acute graft-vs-host disease (AGVHD), to evaluate this issue. In AGVHD, transfer of naive parental T cells into F1 hosts stimulates the development of allospecific CTL effectors that eliminate host lymphocytes, particularly B cells. Complete elimination of IFN-γ, using IFN-γ-deficient donors and administering anti-IFN-γ mAb, suppressed B cell elimination, down-regulated ΤNF-α production, and enhanced Th2 cytokine production, but did not allow the B cell expansion characteristic of chronic GVHD (CGVHD). Because complete CTL inhibition results in full-blown CGVHD that is IFN-γ independent, these observations indicate that IFN-γ elimination only partially blocks CTL development. IFN-γ elimination did not inhibit donor T cell engraftment or activation in the AGVHD model, but almost completely blocked Fas/Fas ligand (FasL) gene expression, protein up-regulation, and Fas/FasL-mediated CTL killing. In contrast, IFN-γ elimination only partially inhibited perforin gene expression and perforin-mediated CTL activity. The contributions of IFN-γ to CTL development were indirect, because IFN-γ receptor-deficient donor cells differentiated normally into allospecific CTLs. Consistent with the view that the Fas/FasL and perforin pathways each mediate CTL killing in AGVHD, the absence of both perforin and IFN-γ (perforin knockout donor cells and anti-IFN-γ mAb) converted AGVHD to CGVHD. Thus, both IFN-γ-dependent induction of Fas/FasL and IFN-γ-independent induction of perforin contribute to CTL-mediated elimination of host B cells in AGVHD. Suppression of both pathways is required for typical CGVHD development.

Fas-mediated apoptosis is an important contributor to contraction of Ag-driven T cell responses acting only on activated Ag-specific T cells. The effects of targeted Fas deletion on selected cell populations are well described however little is known regarding the consequences of Fas deletion on only activated Ag-specific T cells. We addressed this question using the parent-into-F1 (P→F1) model of acute or chronic (lupus-like) graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) as a model of either a CTL-mediated or T-dependent B cell-mediated response, respectively. By transferring Fas-deficient lpr donor T cells into Fas-intact F1 hosts, the in vivo role of Ag-specific T cell Fas can be determined. Our results demonstrate a novel dichotomy of Ag-specific T cell Fas function in that: 1) Fas expression on Ag-activated T cells has costimulatory, helper, and down-regulatory roles in vivo and 2) these roles were observed only in a CTL response (acute GVHD) and not in a T-dependent B cell response (chronic GVHD). Specifically, CD4 T cell Fas expression is important for optimal CD4 initial expansion and absolutely required for help for CD8 effector CTL. Donor CD8 T cell Fas expression played an important but not exclusive role in apoptosis and down-regulation. By contrast, CD4 Fas expression played no detectable role in modulating chronic GVHD induction or disease expression. These results demonstrate a novel role for Ag-specific T cell Fas expression in in vivo CTL responses and support a review of the paradigm by which Fas deficiency accelerates lupus in MRL/lpr lupus-prone mice.

T cells play an essential role in driving humoral autoimmunity in lupus. Molecules such as TRAIL exhibit strong T cell modulatory effects and are up-regulated in lupus, raising the possibility that they may influence disease severity. To address this possibility, we examined the role of TRAIL expression on pathogenic T cells in an induced model of murine lupus, the parent-into-F1 (P→F1) model of chronic graft-vs-host disease (GVHD), using wild-type or TRAIL-deficient donor T cells. Results were compared with mice undergoing suppressive acute GVHD. Although chronic GVHD mice exhibited less donor T cell TRAIL up-regulation and IFN-α-inducible gene expression than acute GVHD mice, donor CD4+ T cell TRAIL expression in chronic GVHD was essential for sustaining effector CD4+ Th cell numbers, for sustaining help to B cells, and for more severe lupus-like renal disease development. Conversely, TRAIL expression on donor CD8+ T cells had a milder, but significant down-regulatory effect on CTL effector function, affecting the perforin/granzyme pathway and not the Fas ligand pathway. These results indicate that, in this model, T cell-expressed TRAIL exacerbates lupus by the following: 1) positively regulating CD4+ Th cell numbers, thereby sustaining T cell help for B cells, and 2) to a lesser degree by negatively regulating perforin-mediated CD8+ CTL killing that could potentially eliminate activated autoreactive B cells.