Brace treatment is the most common nonoperative treatment for the prevention of curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The success reported in level 1 and 2 clinical trials is approximately 75%. The aim of this review was to identify the main risk factors that significantly reduce success rate of brace treatment.A literature search using the MEDLINE and Embase databases was conducted. Studies were included if they identified specific risk factor(s) for curve progression. Studies that looked at nighttime braces, superiority of one type of brace over another, the effect of physical therapy on brace performance, cadaver or nonhuman studies were excluded. A total of 1,022 articles were identified of which 25 met all of the inclusion criteria. Seven risk factors were identified: Poor brace compliance (eight studies), lack of skeletal maturity (six studies), Cobb angle over a certain threshold (six studies), poor in-brace correction (three studies), vertebral rotation (four studies), osteopenia (two studies), and thoracic curve type (two studies). Three risk factors were highly repeated in the literature which identified specific subgroups of patients who have a much higher risk to fail brace treatment and to progress to fusion. This data demonstrates that 60% to 70% of the patients referred to bracing are Risser 0 and 30% to 70% of this group will not wear the brace enough to ensure treatment efficacy. Furthermore, Risser 0 patients who reach the accelerated growth phase with a curve ≥40˚are at 70% to 100% risk of curve progression to the fusion surgical threshold despite proper brace wear. Skeletally immature patients with relatively large magnitude scoliosis who are noncompliant FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.

Clinicians are faced with a growing number of athletes with injured tendons. Treatment of both acute and chronic injuries has proven to be quite complex. It is difficult to maintain the balance between resting the injured tendon and preventing atrophy of the surrounding muscles and joints. Questions also arise as to when the tendon should be strengthened and when the athlete is ready to return to full activity in sport. Through an awareness of the structural and mechanical properties of the tendon, an exercise programme for the rehabilitation of tendon injuries has been developed. It is recommended that this programme be used in combination with ice and other physical modalities. This approach will resolve most tendon injuries within 6 weeks of its implementation. The use of anti-inflammatory medications and surgery can only be recommended in select situations where more conservative measures are inadequate.

Level III.

No abstract