Selection of the ideal antiseptic or antimicrobial treatment for contaminated wounds remains a controversial decision. Clinical decisions are often made on the basis of in vitro studies and personal preference. Although topical solutions are widely used, their comparative in vivo effects on wound healing are largely unreported.A porcine wound model was used to compare five commonly used topical agents-5% mafenide acetate (Sulfamylon solution), 10% povidone with 1% free iodine (Betadine), 0.25% sodium hypochlorite ("half-strength" Dakin), 3% hydrogen peroxide, and 0.25% acetic acid-with a control group. Reepithelialization, angiogenesis, neodermal regeneration, fibroblast proliferation, collagen production, and bacterial colony counts were analyzed at 4 and 7 days after wounding (n = 4). Reepithelialization was not significantly influenced among the various treatment modalities tested. Sulfamylon and Dakin solutions significantly increased neodermal thickness (p < 0.05), whereas hydrogen peroxide and acetic acid significantly inhibited neodermal formation (p < 0.001). All treatments except hydrogen peroxide significantly increased fibroblast proliferation. Sulfamylon and Betadine significantly enhanced angiogenesis (p < 0.05). Sulfamylon proved most effective in maintaining an aseptic environment while concomitantly increasing angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and dermal thickness compared with control. These data show that selection of a particular topical treatment can affect various aspects of wound repair in an animal model. These results suggest that the selection of topical treatments in the clinical setting should be carefully tailored to match unique wound situations and therapeutic endpoints.

Sixty patients who had ipsilateral chest wall recurrence of breast cancer and no detectable distant metastases were evaluated retrospectively to determine the implications of chest wall recurrence as the first site of therapeutic failure. Mean time intervals between treatment of the primary breast cancer and discovery of local recurrence, between treatment of local recurrence and distant metastases, and between treatment of local recurrence and death in order and, respectively, in years for pathologic Stages I, II, and III patients were 6.2, 4.3 and 2.1; 4.2, 3.5, and 1.2; and 7.2, 6.0, and 2.5. Surgical resection resulted in the best local control. All patients eventually died of metastatic breast cancer, one as late as 23 years after treatment of the local recurrence. No Stage I patients recurred before two years. An arbitrary delay of two years before recommending breast reconstruction to avoid masking local recurrence seems unjustified for pathologic Stage I patients.

The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy and practical utility of a noncontact laser Doppler imager (PIM-II, Lisca Development AB, Linköping, Sweden) in the estimation of burn depth in the upper and lower extremities. At 48 hours after burn injury, we performed scans of 35 burns in 22 patients and obtained histological samples for burn determination with hematoxylin and eosin and vimentin immunohistochemical staining. Additionally, sequential scans and tissue specimens were obtained on 10 burns at 24, 48, and 72 hours. A statistically significant inverse relationship was noted between burn depth and the laser Doppler perfusion index. Laser Doppler perfusion index values greater than 1.3 predicted a superficial dermal burn with 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Superficial dermal burns exhibited increased perfusion in the early burn period. Wounds showed a progressive decline in perfusion and a progressive increase in the depth of injury during a 72-hour period. This study demonstrates the advantage and accuracy of using a noncontact laser Doppler to differentiate deep dermal from superficial partial thickness burns in the extremities.

No abstract