The effectiveness of a preoperative psychotherapeutic intervention with breast cancer patients was assessed in a randomized controlled trial: (1) preoperative interview plus a 30‐minute preoperative psychotherapeutic intervention; (2) preoperative interview plus a 30‐minute chat to control for the effects of attention; (3) preoperative interview only; and (4) routine hospital care control. A clinical psychologist interviewed the patient in hospital the afternoon before surgery. A consultant surgeon trained in listening and counselling skills conducted a 30‐minute psychotherapeutic intervention or chat. Psychological measures included anxiety and depression, body image distress, stressful life events, social support, and coping. Patients receiving a preoperative interview had lower body image distress at 3 months and 1 year than controls. Controls also showed significantly less Fighting Spirit in 1‐year interviews, and more control patients were cases for both anxiety and depression on Present State Examination criteria at 1 year than patients in the experimental groups. The psychotherapeutic intervention was superior to the chat among patients with severe stressful life events. Patients in the chat condition used their 30 minutes with the surgeon to explore symbolically themes of loss and restitution. In a multivariate model for predicting psychological outcome at 3 months and 1 year, experimental group remained a significant predictor when surgical procedure and age were included in the regression equation. Patients undergoing sector mastectomy had lower body image distress scores than mastectomy patients both at 3 months and 1 year. Psychological morbidity in the sample was high preoperatively (59%) and at 1 year (39%), but detection of morbidity by health professionals was poor. Predictors of caseness at follow‐up included caseness preoperatively, severe stressful life events, age, marital status, and social support. Implications of the findings for the care of cancer patients in hospital are discussed.

Objectives The National Health Service has recently begun the introduction of a Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP), offering biennial screening to men and women aged 60-69 years. This study aimed to explore public perceptions regarding the communication of information designed to facilitate informed choice in relation to this new screening programme.Methods Fourteen single sex focus groups were conducted in England with 86 individuals aged 60-69 years. Focus groups were conducted either with individuals who had participated in the pilot phase of the BCSP, or with members of the public living outside the pilot areas.Results The majority of participants expressed positive attitudes towards bowel cancer screening, identifying items highlighting the benefits of the programme as important for others to know. Whilst some believed it was appropriate for information regarding the potentially negative aspects of the programme to be communicated at the outset, others expressed concerns about the generation of anxiety and potential for decreased participation. A number of participants questioned the concept of informed choice, arguing that once in place, a screening programme should be vigorously promoted.Conclusions There is some variation in the type of information favoured by those eligible for bowel cancer screening. This may present challenges for the provision of information aiming to facilitate informed choice in the BCSP. Flexible approaches to information provision that recognize the perceptions of patients may be required.

No abstract

Fifty‐one surgical consultants, registrars and senior registrars in NHS hospitals in the West Midlands (UK) were interviewed about psychological aspects of cancer surgery: information given to patients, the bad news interview, psychological risk factors in surgery, psychiatric morbidity, difficult patients, and care of the dying. Information that tended to be provided infrequently included the cause of the disease, the effects of surgery on sexual functioning, and psychological side‐effects of the surgery. Surgeons most often answered incompletely patients' questions about prognosis, effects of surgery on sexual functioning, the presence of malignancy, and probable length of life. Concerning the disclosure of malignancy, 37% said they always tell the patient; 8% tell virtually all patients; 49% tell the patient depending on the patient's and relatives' wishes; and 6% tell the relatives and possibly the patient. A common strategy among 49% is to use the word ‘growth’ and wait for the patient to ask further. Few surgeons took even the briefest psychiatric history, and only the most severe post‐operative psychological complications were referred to psychiatrists. The most difficult patients for surgeons to manage were emotionally labile, angry, demanding, controlling, refusing treatment, or predicting failure. The surgeons in this sample clearly struggled with their role as giver of bad news and with the consequent emotional reactions of the patient. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.