BackgroundEndoscopic thyroidectomy and robotic thyroidectomy are effective and safe surgical options for thyroid surgery, with excellent cosmetic outcomes. However, in regard to lateral neck dissection (LND), much effort is required to alleviate cervical disfigurement derived from a long incision. Technologic innovations have allowed for endoscopic LND, without the need for extended cervical incisions and providing access to remote sites, including axillary, chest–breast, face-lift, transoral, and hybrid approaches.MethodsA comprehensive review of published literature was performed using the search terms “lateral neck dissection”, “thyroid”, and “endoscopy OR endoscopic OR endoscope OR robotic” in PubMed.ResultsThis review provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding endoscopic LND, and it specifically addresses the following points: 1) the surgical procedure, 2) the indications and contraindications, 3) the complications and surgical outcomes, and 4) the technical advantages and limitations. Robotic LND, totally endoscopic LND, and endoscope-assisted LND are separately discussed.ConclusionsEndoscopic LND is a feasible and safe technique in terms of complete resection of the selected neck levels, complications, and cosmetic outcomes. However, it is recommended to strictly select criteria when expanding the population of eligible patients. A formal indication for endoscopic LND has not yet been established. Thus, a well-designed, multicenter study with a large cohort is necessary to confirm the feasibility, long-term outcomes, oncological safety, and influence of endoscopic LND on patient quality of life (QoL).

Background: Carbon nanoparticles (CNs) have been used intraoperatively in open thyroid surgery to facilitate central neck dissection and parathyroid protection. However, little attention was paid to the preoperative injection of CNs. Its safety and feasibility remain to be evaluated in bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy (BABA RT).Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 114 papillary thyroid cancer patients (PTC) undergoing BABA RT were enrolled from March 2020 to March 2021. In the CNs group (n=64), 0.15 mL of CNs was injected into the thyroid lobules with malignant nodules the day before surgery. Medical records were reviewed and analyzed, including complications of CNs usage, surgical outcomes, central lymph node (CLN) retrieval, and parathyroid glands (PGs)-related parameters.Results: No significant differences were found between the CNs and the control groups in terms of general characteristics and surgical parameters. Complications of CNs were rare in the CNs group. The mean number of retrieved CLN was significantly higher in the CNs group than in the control group (9.48±4.88 vs. 5.40±2.67, P<0.001), as was the mean number of metastatic CLN (2.00±2.56 vs. 1.04±1.70, P=0.018). There were no differences in PGs preserved in situ, PGs autotransplantation, and postoperative PTH levels on the first day and first month (all P>0.05). Conclusions:In patients with PTC undergoing BABA RT, preoperative application of CNs is a safe and feasible method to facilitate central neck dissection. However, the value of the preoperative application of CNs in robotic thyroidectomy needs to be further studied because it has no significant benefit for parathyroid protection.

BackgroundThis study assessed the safety and oncologic outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy via the bilateral axillary breast approach (BABA RT) for conventional open procedures. The learning curves of BABA RT were further evaluated.MethodsAn exact 1:1 matching analysis was performed to compare the technical safety and oncologic outcomes between robotic thyroidectomy and conventional open surgery. Learning curves were assessed using cumulative summation analysis.ResultsThere was no significant difference in general characteristics, short time outcomes (including transient hypoparathyroidism, transient postoperative hoarseness, hematoma/seroma, mean postoperative hospital stay, and other complications), the number of retrieved central lymph nodes, and recurrence rates between robotic BABA and conventional groups. The mean number of retrieved lateral LNs in the robotic group was significantly less than those in the conventional group. The learning curve for working space making, robotic lobectomy, and total thyroidectomy are approximately 15, 30, and 20 cases, respectively. No differences except for operation time were found between the learning group and the proficient group.ConclusionsRobotic thyroidectomy and neck dissection via BABA are feasible in terms of surgical completeness, surgical safety, and oncological safety. Our results provide a criterion for judging whether the surgeon has entered the stable stage of robotic thyroidectomy via BABA in terms of the operative time.

Background The safety of gasless endoscopic trans-axillary thyroid surgery is still undetermined. Methods Clinical findings and postoperative complications of patients who had undergone trans-axillary thyroid surgery due to thyroid cancer and thyroid nodules were retrospectively studied. The sensory change and paralysis results from this technique and patients’ satisfaction with the cosmesis were also studied. Results Fifty-one patients (49 females and 2 males) received operations by gasless, endoscopic trans-axillary approaches with one patient whose operation was converted to open surgery because of internal jugular vein injury. Only two patients developed temporary vocal cord paralysis and no patients developed other severe complications. The alleviation of the discomfort in the anterior neck area and sternocleidomastoid, and the cosmetic effect of gasless endoscopic trans-axillary thyroid surgery were acceptable. No evidence of recurrence was found during the follow-up period. Conclusions Gasless, endoscopic trans-axillary thyroid surgery is a feasible procedure with acceptable safety and better cosmetic results in strictly selected patients.

No abstract