Supercritical water fluidized beds (SCWFBs) are promising and efficient reactors for the gasification of coal in supercritical water. The understanding and investigation of multi-phase flows as well as the gasification process usually rely on time-consuming experiments or numerical simulations, which prohibit fast and full exploration of the single and coupled effects of the operation and geometric parameters. To this end, this paper builds an efficient surrogate-assisted parameter analysis framework for the SCWFB reactor. Particularly, (1) it establishes a steady numerical simulation model of the SCWFB reactor for the subsequent analysis; and (2) it employs a Gaussian process surrogate modeling via efficient adaptive sampling to serve as an approximation for predicting the carbon conversion efficiency (CE) of the reactor. Based on this parameter analysis framework, this paper investigates the effects of five independent parameters (the mass flow rate of supercritical water, mass flow rate of the coal slurry, temperature of supercritical water, temperature of the outer wall and reactor length) and their interactions on the reaction performance in terms of the carbon conversion efficiency (CE). We found that the CE increases as a function of the temperature of supercritical water, the temperature of the outer wall and the reactor length; while it decreases as a function of the mass flow rate of supercritical water and the mass flow rate of the coal slurry. Additionally, the global sensitivity analysis demonstratesthat the influence of the temperature of the outer wall exerts a stronger effect than all the other factors on the CE, and the coupled interaction among parameters has a slight effect on the CE. This research provides useful guidance for scaled-up designs and optimization of the SCWFB reactor.
Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of coal is a promising clean coal technology, which discards the traditional coal combustion and oxidation reaction to release carbon dioxide and other pollutants and replaces coal with a gasification reduction reaction in supercritical water to finally convert coal into a hydrogen-rich gas product with no net carbon dioxide emissions and no pollutant emissions, and thus has received much attention in recent years. However, the experimental conditions of coal to the hydrogen reactor are harsh, costly, and not easy to visualize and analyze, so numerical calculation and simulation analysis are important for the design, optimization, and industrial scaling-up of the reactor. In order to study the effect of the temperature field on the hydrogen production rate of the coal supercritical water gasification hydrogen production reactor, a numerical simulation calculation model is developed for this reactor in this paper. Comparing the experimental data in the literature, the maximum relative error of the gasification product yield per kg of coal between the two is less than 5%, which verifies the accuracy of the model built and the numerical method adopted in this paper. On this basis, the effects of supercritical water temperature and coal slurry temperature on the reactor’s gasification products and reaction rate were investigated in depth. The results show that increasing the supercritical water temperature is beneficial to improve the reactor hydrogen production efficiency, while the high coal slurry temperature is not conducive to adequate reaction, thus reducing the hydrogen production efficiency. For the laboratory coal supercritical water gasification to hydrogen reactor studied in this paper, the ideal temperature of supercritical water is 850~900 K, and the ideal temperature of coal slurry is 400–450 K. The conclusions of this paper can provide some reference for subsequent industrial scale-up studies of the reactor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.