Regulation of ribosomal RNA genes is a fundamental process that supports the growth of cells and is tightly coupled with cell differentiation. Although rRNA transcriptional control by RNA polymerase I (Pol I) and associated factors is well studied, the lineage-specific mechanisms governing rRNA expression remain elusive. Runt-related transcription factors Runx1, Runx2 and Runx3 establish and maintain cell identity, and convey phenotypic information through successive cell divisions for regulatory events that determine cell cycle progression or exit in progeny cells. Here we establish that mammalian Runx2 not only controls lineage commitment and cell proliferation by regulating genes transcribed by RNA Pol II, but also acts as a repressor of RNA Pol I mediated rRNA synthesis. Within the condensed mitotic chromosomes we find that Runx2 is retained in large discrete foci at nucleolar organizing regions where rRNA genes reside. These Runx2 chromosomal foci are associated with open chromatin, co-localize with the RNA Pol I transcription factor UBF1, and undergo transition into nucleoli at sites of rRNA synthesis during interphase. Ribosomal RNA transcription and protein synthesis are enhanced by Runx2 deficiency that results from gene ablation or RNA interference, whereas induction of Runx2 specifically and directly represses rDNA promoter activity. Runx2 forms complexes containing the RNA Pol I transcription factors UBF1 and SL1, co-occupies the rRNA gene promoter with these factors in vivo, and affects local chromatin histone modifications at rDNA regulatory regions. Thus Runx2 is a critical mechanistic link between cell fate, proliferation and growth control. Our results suggest that lineage-specific control of ribosomal biogenesis may be a fundamental function of transcription factors that govern cell fate.
Genome replication in eukaryotic cells necessitates the stringent coupling of histone biosynthesis with the onset of DNA replication at the G 1 /S phase transition. A fundamental question is the mechanism that links the restriction (R) point late in G 1 with histone gene expression at the onset of S phase. Here we demonstrate that HiNF-P, a transcriptional regulator of replication-dependent histone H4 genes, interacts directly with p220NPAT , a substrate of cyclin E/CDK2, to coactivate histone genes during S phase. HiNF-P and p220 are targeted to, and colocalize at, subnuclear foci (Cajal bodies) in a cell cycle-dependent manner. Genetic or biochemical disruption of the HiNF-P/p220 interaction compromises histone H4 gene activation at the G 1 /S phase transition and impedes cell cycle progression. Our results show that HiNF-P and p220 form a critical regulatory module that directly links histone H4 gene expression at the G 1 /S phase transition to the cyclin E/CDK2 signaling pathway at the R point.Fidelity of genome replication in eukaryotic cells is essential for cell division and necessitates the stringent coupling of histone biosynthesis with DNA replication to ensure that nascent DNA is immediately assembled into chromatin during DNA synthesis. Cell division requires staged expression of genes in response to growth factors, which induce cell growth from quiescence or maintain competency for cell cycle progression during periods of active proliferation. Stimulation of cell proliferation initially triggers a cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) cascade, which activates the cyclin E/CDK2 kinase complex at the restriction (R) point (17,19). The R point is the major cell cycle checkpoint that controls the commitment for DNA replication in late G 1 via CDK2-dependent release of E2F from Rb-related proteins. The R point is mechanistically linked through E2F to activate the gene regulatory program necessary for nucleotide metabolism and DNA replication (17,19). Passage beyond the R point permits growth factor-independent entry into S phase and subsequent cell cycle stages. However, cell cycle progression remains constrained by multiple checkpoints, including surveillance mechanisms that monitor DNA integrity and fidelity of chromatin assembly.We postulate that the induction of histone gene expression at the G 1 /S phase transition represents a second necessary cell cycle regulatory event. The coupling of DNA synthesis with histone protein production is maintained by coordinately inducing expression of the multiple core histone gene subtypes, including the 15 distinct histone H4 genes, at the onset of S phase (1,3,12,20,23,24). The cell cycle regulatory sequence of histone H4 genes lacks E2F binding sites (28). We have recently identified the key transcription factor of H4 genes, histone nuclear factor P (HiNF-P), which interacts with a highly conserved histone H4 subtype-specific element in the site II cell cycle regulatory domain (16). HiNF-P supports histone gene transcription at the G 1 /S phase transition indepe...
Cleidocranial dysplasia (CCD) in humans is an autosomal-dominant skeletal disease that results from mutations in the bone-specific transcription factor RUNX2 (CBFA1/AML3). However, distinct RUNX2 mutations in CCD do not correlate with the severity of the disease. Here we generated a new mouse model with a hypomorphic Runx2 mutant allele (Runx2(neo7)), in which only part of the transcript is processed to full-length (wild-type) Runx2 mRNA. Homozygous Runx2(neo7/neo7) mice express a reduced level of wild-type Runx2 mRNA (55-70%) and protein. This mouse model allowed us to establish the minimal requirement of functional Runx2 for normal bone development. Runx2(neo7/neo7) mice have grossly normal skeletons with no abnormalities observed in the growth plate, but do exhibit developmental defects in calvaria and clavicles that persist through post-natal growth. Clavicle defects are caused by disrupted endochondral bone formation during embryogenesis. These hypomorphic mice have altered calvarial bone volume, as observed by histology and microCT imaging, and decreased expression of osteoblast marker genes. The bone phenotype of the heterozygous mice, which have 79-84% of wild-type Runx2 mRNA, is normal. These results show there is a critical gene dosage requirement of functional Runx2 for the formation of intramembranous bone tissues during embryogenesis. A decrease to 70% of wild-type Runx2 levels results in the CCD syndrome, whereas levels>79% produce a normal skeleton. Our findings suggest that the range of bone phenotypes in CCD patients is attributable to quantitative reduction in the functional activity of RUNX2.
Background: MicroRNAs control cell growth and differentiation in part by inhibiting transcription factor expression. Results: Specific microRNAs in mesenchymal cells block osteoblastic and chondrocytic but not adipocytic cell fate. Conclusion: Select microRNA-transcription factor networks control mesenchymal cell fate. Significance: MicroRNAs can be used to manipulate stem cells for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.
Lineage progression in osteoblasts and chondrocytes is stringently controlled by the cell-fate-determining transcription factor Runx2. In this study, we directly addressed whether microRNAs (miRNAs) can control the osteogenic activity of Runx2 and affect osteoblast maturation. A panel of 11 Runx2-targeting miRNAs (miR-23a, miR-30c, miR-34c, miR-133a, miR-135a, miR-137, miR-204, miR-205, miR-217, miR-218, and miR-338) is expressed in a lineage-related pattern in mesenchymal cell types. During both osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation, these miRNAs, in general, are inversely expressed relative to Runx2. Based on 3′UTR luciferase reporter, immunoblot, and mRNA stability assays, each miRNA directly attenuates Runx2 protein accumulation. Runx2-targeting miRNAs differentially inhibit Runx2 protein expression in osteoblasts and chondrocytes and display different efficacies. Thus, cellular context contributes to miRNA-mediated regulation of Runx2. All Runx2-targeting miRNAs (except miR-218) significantly impede osteoblast differentiation, and their effects can be reversed by the corresponding anti-miRNAs. These findings demonstrate that osteoblastogenesis is limited by an elaborate network of functionally tested miRNAs that directly target the osteogenic master regulator Runx2.osteogenesis | chondrogenesis | post-transcriptional regulation C ell-fate determination and subsequent lineage progression of phenotype-committed cells are mediated by master regulatory transcription factors that integrate multiple cell-signaling inputs and generate epigenetic changes in chromatin to modulate gene expression. Transcription factors are components of positive and negative feedback loops that initiate or maintain the acquisition of distinct biological states. Epigenomic mechanisms, including attenuation of mRNA and protein expression by small noncoding microRNAs (miRNAs) (1), permit effective control of gene expression beyond genomic interactions between transcription factors and their cognate elements in gene promoters. The biological potency of miRNAs, which are generated by the RNA processing enzyme Dicer, is based on their ability to control mRNA accumulation and/or protein synthesis through specific interactions with the 3′UTRs of target genes (1). Gene regulatory networks involving transcription factors and miRNAs may mutually reinforce cell fates and support phenotypic maturation of lineage-committed cells.Osteogenic differentiation provides an effective cell model in which to define both epigenetic and epigenomic mechanisms required for cell-fate determination and phenotypic differentiation. Differentiation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells into the osteoblast lineage and maturation of osteoprogenitors are controlled by multiple extracellular ligands [e.g., BMPs, WNTs, and FGFs] (2-4) that direct the activities of key transcription factors, including Runx2, Osterix, and different classes of homeodomain proteins (5-8). Runx2 is a critical regulator of the osteogenic lineage, and its epigenetic functions modulate ...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.