Background: This study sought to investigate the correlation between inpatient satisfaction and surgical quality evaluation indicators, and explore the factors affecting inpatient satisfaction.Methods: A total of 5,000 inpatients who underwent surgery at 10 tertiary. A hospital in Chongqing were randomly selected and asked to complete an inpatient satisfaction questionnaire developed by our team in a previous study. A logistic regression was undertaken to analyze the factors affecting inpatient satisfaction, and the relationship between inpatient satisfaction and evaluation indicators of surgical quality. Results:The overall satisfaction level of inpatients undergoing surgery was high. Specifically, the satisfaction level was 88.7%, and the dissatisfaction level was 11.3%. A univariate analysis showed that age, marital status, education level, monthly family income, the source of medical costs, the average length of the hospital stay, first hospitalization or not, doctor-patient communication, the quality of surgery, service attitude, 30-day postoperative mortality, major and minor complications, the rescue failure rate, readmission, and the incision infection rate affected the patient satisfaction, and the difference between satisfied and dissatisfied patients in each group was statistically significant (all P=0.000). The results of the logistic regression analysis showed that the factors related to the satisfaction of surgical quality indicators were postoperative 30-day mortality, major and minor complications, the rescue failure rate, the incision infection rate, and the average length of the hospital stay (all P<0.05), and the factors related to a decrease in inpatient satisfaction were increased postoperative 30-day mortality, a high incidence of major and minor complications, a high rescue failure rate, and a high incision infection rate.Conclusions: There was a significant correlation between inpatient satisfaction and surgical quality evaluation indicators (i.e., 30-day mortality, major and minor complications, the rescue failure rate, the incision infection rate, and the average length of the hospital stay).
Objective: To learn from the experience of foreign general practice education mode, and to exploratory study on the mode and method of general education and training for general practice undergraduates in China.Background: The rise of general practice medicine addresses the lack of holistic attention to patients in specialist medicine. General practice education is an important means of training general practice skills, but the development of general practice education in China is not yet matured. Methods: By using the method of comparative education, taking the United States, Australia, France and Britain as examples. This article makes a comparative analyzes the status of general practice education in foreign countries and discusses the development of undergraduate general practice education in China from four perspectives: national policy, teacher resources, curriculum system, and education training modes. Conclusion:The four countries attach great importance to general practice education, with mature training methods, registered practice and continuing education. It is hoped that this article can establish and improve the policy system for the development of general subject teachers and optimize the inclusive, assessment and evaluation system of general practice teachers. In addition, more attention should be paid to general practice scientific research to create a teaching team with high standards, high quality, and high scientific research literacy and to form standardized scientific teaching methods that promote the development of general medicine education and training through high-quality teaching experiences. In addition, more attention should be paid to general practice scientific research to create a teaching team with high standards, high quality, and high scientific research literacy and to form standardized scientific teaching methods that promote the development of general medicine education and training through high-quality teaching experiences.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.