BackgroundEvidence that home telemonitoring for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) offers clinical benefit over usual care is controversial as is evidence of a health economic advantage.MethodsBetween January 2010 and June 2013, patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CHF were enrolled and randomly assigned to 2 study groups comprising usual care with and without an interactive bi-directional remote monitoring system (Motiva®). The primary endpoint in CardioBBEAT is the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) established by the groups’ difference in total cost and in the combined clinical endpoint “days alive and not in hospital nor inpatient care per potential days in study” within the follow-up of 12 months.ResultsA total of 621 predominantly male patients were enrolled, whereof 302 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 319 to the control group. Ischemic cardiomyopathy was the leading cause of heart failure. Despite randomization, subjects of the control group were more often in NYHA functional class III–IV, and exhibited peripheral edema and renal dysfunction more often. Additionally, the control and intervention groups differed in heart rhythm disorders. No differences existed regarding risk factor profile, comorbidities, echocardiographic parameters, especially left ventricular and diastolic diameter and ejection fraction, as well as functional test results, medication and quality of life. While the observed baseline differences may well be a play of chance, they are of clinical relevance. Therefore, the statistical analysis plan was extended to include adjusted analyses with respect to the baseline imbalances.ConclusionsCardioBBEAT provides prospective outcome data on both, clinical and health economic impact of home telemonitoring in CHF. The study differs by the use of a high evidence level randomized controlled trial (RCT) design along with actual cost data obtained from health insurance companies. Its results are conducive to informed political and economic decision-making with regard to home telemonitoring solutions as an option for health care. Overall, it contributes to developing advanced health economic evaluation instruments to be deployed within the specific context of the German Health Care System.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02293252; date of registration: 10 November 2014

Due to the marked increase in the numbers of women in medicine, professional and political discussions on equality among doctors are gaining increasing attention. One such issue is "operating during pregnancy". As a result of existing legislation and federal regulations, it has been virtually impossible for pregnant surgeons to continue their surgical work. After approval by the Federal Council or Bundesrat, the revised Maternity Protection Act will come into force on 01.01.2018. It will thereafter be easier for surgeons to operate during pregnancy. The focus will now be on the transformation of workplace practices, in which individual risk assessments of the participating surgeons will be carried out in order to achieve a risk-adapted operation, and thus to prevent premature and unwanted restrictions on the employment of pregnant female surgeons.

No abstract

Surgery is indeed one of the most fascinating medical professions. However, it is also a stressful field of work with a high workload, and often leaves little time for personal and family needs. Within the last decade, a noticeable decline occurred in the willingness of medical students to enter a surgical residency. In fact, Generation Y is highly interested in a medical career with a respectful working atmosphere and balanced work and private life, as published in several recent papers. Therefore, surgery must evolve with the times to retain its attractiveness as a career choice for medical students and to compete for the best talents from Generation Y. However, little is known about what senior surgeons really expect from young surgical residents. On the basis of a recent survey by the Professional Association of German Surgeons, this paper tries to give some insights in this very relevant topic and a perspective on how to increase the attractiveness of our fascinating specialty. In fact, in this survey, senior surgeons defined a very clear requirement profile for surgical residency applicants. While the colleagues defined accurate applicant documents, a previous internship, self-motivation, and impressions from the job interview as the most important factors for a successful application for a surgical residency, a standard period of study or a dissertation was deemed of lower importance.

No abstract