Campylobacter is a very rare cause of bloodstream infection, although it has been found relatively frequently in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and new forms of immunosuppression on the incidence of Campylobacter bacteremia has not been sufficiently assessed. In this study we analyzed the incidence and microbiologic and clinical characteristics of Campylobacter bacteremia over 23 years.We reviewed the clinical records of all patients who had Campylobacter bacteremia from 1985 to 2007. Available strains were reidentified using universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR).During the study period, there were 71 episodes of Campylobacter bacteremia in 63 patients (0.24% of all bloodstream infections), and the incidence remained stable (mean, 0.06/1000 admissions per year and 0.47/100,000 inhabitants per year). Median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 31.25-72.5 yr), and 82% of patients were male. The underlying conditions included liver disease (21/64, 32.8%), HIV infection (15/64, 23.4%), malignancy (7/64, 10.9%), solid organ transplantation (2/64, 3%), hypogammaglobulinemia (10/64, 15.6%), and other (18/64, 31.2%). Twelve patients shared more than 1 underlying condition. Campylobacter bacteremia was community acquired in 81% of the episodes. The origin of the bloodstream infection was abdominal (43.5%), primary (26%), or extraintestinal (31%: respiratory 15%, cellulitis 4.8%, urinary 8%, other 3%). C jejuni was recovered in 66% of cases, C fetus in 19%, and C coli in 12%.Universal PCR was performed on 14 available strains. Molecular and conventional identification matched in 8 isolates. In contrast, molecular methods classified as C fetus (n = 2) and C jejuni (n = 1) 3 strains formerly identified only to genus level as Campylobacter species. In another 3 isolates, molecular identification was not consistent with the phenotypic identification (C fetus identified as C jejuni).Complications appeared in 23.9% of patients. Quinolone resistance was observed in 50% of the isolates. Only 37.8% of patients received appropriate empirical therapy. Mortality was 16.4%, although it was higher in HIV-infected patients than uninfected patients (33% vs. 10%; p = 0.04), in cases of hospital-acquired Campylobacter bacteremia compared with community-acquired cases (38.5% vs. 9.4%; p = 0.02), and in the presence of complications compared with patients without complications (100% vs. 0%; p < 0.001). The incidence of recurrence was 5% (3 patients with humoral immunodeficiency). There was a higher proportion of HIV-infected patients among patients with Campylobacter bacteremia in the pre-HAART era (1985-1996) than in the HAART era (1997-2007)-27.5% (11/40) vs. 14.3% (4/28)-although the difference was not statistically significant. Debilitating diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease emerged as predisposing conditions in the HAART era (0% before HAART era vs. 14.3% in HAART era; p = 0.032).Campylobacter bacteremia is no longer a signifi...

Statistics and Epidemiology are crucial both in clinical decision-making and clinical research. Teaching these disciplines in a Bachelor’s Degree in Medicine is a significant challenge. In this paper, we aim to describe two participatory teaching methods used in a yearlong second-year course that includes both Epidemiology and Statistics, and to analyze how these two methodologies affect the students’ perception of the course and their abilities related to these subjects. Both methodologies consist in carrying out a specific practical activity. The first practical activity is carried out using a website and aims to help students understand concepts and interpret information; the second involves analyzing a database using a statistical package and, subsequently, producing a scientific report. In addition, we prepared a questionnaire to find out the students’ perception of these issues. The nine questionnaire items were assessed using a rating scale and adapted to characteristics of the course, which covers Epidemiology and Statistics in an integrated manner. Then we assessed the differences in perception before and after the activities were carried out. The results show that the students’ perception improved significantly in the following items: “importance of Statistics and Epidemiology in Medicine”; “usefulness in clinical practice”; “understanding concepts”; “ability to perform a statistical analysis”; and “ability to sort data”. The difference was not significant in the remaining four items. In conclusion, the students’ perception of their ability in Statistics and Epidemiology significantly improved after completing the practical activities, and their perception of importance and usefulness of these subjects also improved.