Interprofessional education (IPE) is essential to develop the healthcare workforce of the future. Geriatrics healthcare professionals have long championed innovations in IPE and patient care, but there is increased urgency to address challenges in aging, dementia, and geriatric mental health in America. In 2010, the Partnership for Health in Aging multidisciplinary competencies and a related position statement in the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society addressed interdisciplinary team (IDT) training in geriatrics. The position statement reported that training in higher education, academic, and continuing education settings has not been sufficiently responsive to workforce needs. In recent years, health professions educators and health systems leaders have increasingly recognized that IPE should be integrally linked with, and performed within, emerging models of team-based, value-driven health care. In this way, IPE will align with learning healthcare systems' pursuit of the Quadruple Aim: improving patient experience, provider experience, and the health of populations, and reducing per capita health care costs. Backed by decades of developing effective team care models and the skill set needed to care for older adults with complex needs, geriatrics healthcare providers from multiple disciplines are uniquely positioned to lead learning healthcare systems in a new effort to develop, implement, and sustain IPE and practice models congruent with these Aims. We provide recommendations for health professions educators, healthcare systems leaders, and policymakers to realize the potential of IPE and interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP) to improve the health of all Americans in aging, dementia, and mental health.

IntroductionIntegrative health care and complementary medicine are widely used by the U.S. population, yet health professions learners are typically inadequately educated to counsel patients on the use of these approaches. This interprofessional standardized patient exercise (ISPE) provides learners the opportunity to discuss various health care professionals' roles in caring for a patient interested in integrative health strategies, and to collaborate on a care plan. Utilizing this ISPE format aligns with the principles of integrative health as it requires interprofessional collaboration to address the multifaceted needs of patients.MethodsThe ISPE is approximately three hours in duration, and required of all UCSF, third-year dentistry, physical therapy, and medical students; second-year nurse practitioner students, and fourth-year pharmacy students. Social work, nutrition, and chaplain trainees also participated. Working in interprofessional teams of 4–5 learners, team members discuss case information, interview the standardized patient (SP) individually, jointly formulate a care plan, and, discuss the plan with the SP. The experience is debriefed with a facilitator.ResultsIn 2016–17, 520 learners participated in the ISPE. They agreed that they learned about the roles of other health care professionals (M = 5.24 on a six-point scale, SD = 1.27), and that they would recommend the ISPE to fellow students in their profession (M = 5.25, SD = 1.30).DiscussionStudents appreciated the ability to observe learners from other health professions interacting with the SP, and how different perspectives and expertise were integrated to create a comprehensive care plan. The exercise can be adapted to accommodate local health professions learners.

Background COVID-19 is an ongoing global health crisis with prevention and treatment recommendations rapidly changing. Rapid response telephone triage and advice services are critical in providing timely care during pandemics. Understanding patient participation with triage recommendations and factors associated with patient participation can assist in developing sensitive and timely interventions for receiving the treatment to prevent adverse health effects of COVID-19. Methods This cohort study aimed to assess patient participation (percentage of patients who followed nursing triage suggestions from the COVID hotline) and identify factors associated with patient participation in four quarterly electronic health records from March 2020 to March 2021 (Phase 1: 14 March 2020–6 June 2020; Phase 2: 17 June 2020–16 September 2020; Phase 3: 17 September 2020–16 December 2020; Phase 4: 17 December 2020–16 March 2021). All callers who provided their symptoms (including asymptomatic with exposure to COVID) and received nursing triage were included in the study. Factors associated with patient participation were identified using multivariable logistic regression analyses, including demographic variables, comorbidity variables, health behaviors, and COVID-19-related symptoms. Results The aggregated data included 9849 encounters/calls from 9021 unique participants. Results indicated: (1) 72.5% of patient participation rate; (2) participants advised to seek emergency department care had the lowest patient participation rate (43.4%); (3) patient participation was associated with older age, a lower comorbidity index, a lack of unexplained muscle aches, and respiratory symptoms. The absence of respiratory symptoms was the only factor significantly associated with patient participation in all four phases (OR = 0.75, 0.60, 0.64, 0.52, respectively). Older age was associated with higher patient participation in three out of four phases (OR = 1.01–1.02), and a lower Charlson comorbidity index was associated with higher patient participation in phase 3 and phase 4 (OR = 0.83, 0.88). Conclusion Public participation in nursing triage during the COVID pandemic requires attention. This study supports using a nurse-led telehealth intervention and reveals crucial factors associated with patient participation. It highlighted the importance of timely follow-up in high-risk groups and the benefit of a telehealth intervention led by nurses serving as healthcare navigators during the COVID-19 pandemic.