OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a novel hepatitis B vaccine, after increasing antigen concentration to 25 μg, in comparison to the reference vaccine. METHODS:Single-blinded randomized trial comparing VrHB-IB (Instituto Butantan) and the reference vaccine (Engerix B®, Glaxo Smith Kline). Volunteers aged 31 to 40 years were randomized to either experimental (n=216) or control (n=203) groups, and were given three doses of vaccine. The fi rst dose was administered upon recruitment, and the second and third doses 30 and 180 days later, respectively, between 2004 and 2005. Blood samples were collected for analysis before randomization and after the second and third doses. Active search for adverse effects was perforned in the fi rst fi ve days after vaccination. Differences were evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests, with a 5% signifi cance level. RESULTS:No severe adverse effects were observed. Seroprotection was confi rmed in 98.6% (213/216) of volunteers in the experimental group and 95.6% (194/203) of those in the control group. Geometric mean titers were 12,557 and 11,673, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:The Brazilian vaccine was considered to be equivalent to the reference vaccine and its use is recommended for adults.
BackgroundRSV is a ubiquitous pathogen causing severe disease in children and the elderly. There is as yet no licensed vaccine. SynGEM, a novel intranasal subunit vaccine based on the RSV F glycoprotein linked to an immunostimulatory bacterium-like-particle carrier, was previously shown in animal models to elicit durable immune responses both locally (nasal secretory IgA) and systemically (serum neutralising antibodies). Induction of mucosal as well as systemic antibodies may enhance protection and reduce transmission. This was the first-in-human phase 1 study of SynGEM in healthy volunteers.MethodsMUC-SynGEM-001 was a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial that enrolled healthy adults aged 18–49 years to evaluate the safety and tolerability of SynGEM. Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to either the low-dose (140 µg F-protein-FP/2 mg BLPs) or high-dose group (350 µg F-protein-FP/5 mg BLPs) and received the vaccine or placebo in a 3:1 ratio. Primary safety outcomes included local or systemic, solicited or unsolicited adverse events (AE) within 28 days and incidence of vaccine-related serious adverse events (SAE) within 57 and 180 days post-vaccination. Antibodies were measured at baseline, day 29 and day 57.ResultsOverall incidence of solicited local (83.3% vs 83.3% vs 83.3%) and systemic (88.9% vs 72.2% vs 75.0%) AEs was similar between low-dose, high-dose and placebo groups. Most were of mild severity and only one was severe in a subject subsequently diagnosed with PCR-confirmed influenza A at the time of vaccination. The most common local side effects included nasal discomfort, rhinorrhea and loss of smell whereas fatigue, headache and myalgia were the most frequent systemic effects. Unsolicited AEs were primarily respiratory and reported by 33.3%, 55.6% and 33.3% of participants in the three respective groups. One SAE possibly related to the vaccine was recorded: a high-dose group participant reported persistent pulsatile tinnitus arising after the prime vaccination. Assessment of immunogenicity revealed significant dose-dependent increases in serum and nasal antibodies.ConclusionSynGEM was generally well tolerated and the data showed that both local and systemic antibodies could be induced by intranasal delivery. However, one SAE was noted and further investigation as to whether intranasal subunit vaccination could be causal is required.Abstract S68 Table 1Overview of solicited and unsolicited adverse eventsGroup 1: 140 µg F-protein-FP/2 mg BLPGroup 2: 350 µg F-protein-FP/5 mg BLPPlacebo Post prime (n=18)Post boost (n=17)Post prime (n=18)Post boost (n=18)Post prime (n=12)Post boost (n=12) n (% of subjects with events)Local solicited AEsLoss of smell3 (16.7)4 (23.5)1 (5.6)02 (16.7)0Nasal discomfort2 (11.1)3 (17.6)3 (16.7)4 (22.2)3 (25.0)1 (8.3)Nasal pain1 (5.6)01 (5.6)2 (11.1)1 (8.3)0Rhinorrhea8 (44.4)4 (23.5)6 (33.3)4 (22.2)3 (25.0)2 (16.7)stuffy nose8 (44.4)5 (29.4)6 (33.3)4 (22.2)4 (33.3)6 (50.0)Sneezing6 (33.3)2 (11.8)1 (5.6)3 (16.7)2 (16.7)2 (16.7)Sore throat2 (11.1)1 (5.9)5 (27.8)3 (1...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.