The objective of this study was to evaluate the value of an intensive telephone follow-up as an additional component of a diabetes disease management program already shown to be effective in improving glycemic control, adherence with American Diabetes Association (ADA) standards of care, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The study involved a randomized controlled trial. The intervention group received a series of 12 weekly phone calls reinforcing base education and self-management skills. Five hundred and seven consenting patients, age 18 years or older, with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus referred to the hospital- based disease management program who had telephones and were able to complete surveys in English or Spanish were enrolled. Outcomes were evaluated at 3 and 12 months follow- up. Adherence to ADA standards of care, specifically annual eye exams, physician foot exams, foot self-exams, and pneumonia vaccination were significantly better with the added telephone intervention, but there were no differences between the groups on glycemic control, HRQOL, or patient satisfaction. The effectiveness of the disease management program was replicated with sustained improvement in glycemic control, HRQOL, and adherence to ADA standards. The additional telephone intervention further improved adherence to ADA guidelines for self-care and medical care but did not affect glycemic control or HRQOL.

Little is known about the role of psychological factors in the functional recovery process of hip fracture patients. This study employed a prospective cohort design to test the hypothesis that hospitalized hip fracture patients with greater reported self-efficacy for conducting rehabilitation therapy would have a greater likelihood of recovering to a pre-fracture level of locomotion function six months after the fracture. This hypothesis was tested controlling for pre-fracture level of function and depressive symptoms reported during hospitalization for surgical repair. An original measure of rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy was evaluated prior to hypothesis testing. Study patients were recruited from two hospitals, interviewed during hospitalization and followed up six months later. Patients included in hypothesis test analyses (n = 24) were mostly women (82%) with a mean age of 79 years. Results showed that patients with higher self-efficacy scores had a greater likelihood of locomotion recovery, controlling for pre-fracture locomotion function level (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00-1.45; P= 0.05). This positive association between rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy and likelihood of locomotion recovery persisted after adding depressive symptoms (the Center for Epidemiological Studies-depression (CES-D) score) to this logistic regression model (AOR for self-efficacy = 1.18; 95% CI = 0.99-1.42; P= 0.07). It is concluded that rehabilitation therapy self-efficacy is a potentially important psychological factor in helping hip fracture patients recover locomotion functioning.

Individuals with chronic disease are not screened routinely for depression. Availability of an abbreviated test with demonstrated reliability and validity might encourage screening so we explored the reliability and validity of a 5-item subset of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale among inner-city outpatients with chronic asthma or diabetes. Most patients were female (73.1%) and Hispanic (61.8%). Acceptable reliability was shown by Cronbach alpha (.76) for the subset of 5 items. Validity was supported by the high correlation of .91 between patients' scores on the 5-item subset and the full 20 items. The 5 items reflected a single factor (eigenvalue = 2.66). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified cut-points for the 5 items that were sensitive (> .84) and specific (> or = .80) in identifying patients classified as depressed by full 20 items. The reduced patient and clinician burden of the subset of 5 items, as well as its desirable psychometric properties, support broader application of this subset as a screening tool for depression.

No abstract

Postadmission Barthel Index scores were the best predictor of the three outcomes measured in this study.