Because thyroid cancer cells express functional TSH receptors (TSHR), TSHR-mRNA in peripheral blood might serve as a tissue-/cancer-specific marker. We measured circulating TSHR-mRNA by RT-PCR in 51 normal controls, 27 patients with benign thyroid disease, 67 patients with treated differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), and eight patients with newly diagnosed DTC, preoperatively. Results were compared with thyroglobulin (Tg) mRNA and serum Tg levels. TSHR-mRNA signals were not detected in normal controls and in 24 of 27 (89%) patients with benign thyroid disease. All 19 patients with treated DTC with evidence of distant or local disease tested positive for TSHR-mRNA (sensitivity 100%). Among patients with no evidence of disease, TSHR-mRNA was detected in 1 in 48 (specificity 98%). Six of the eight newly diagnosed DTC patients tested preoperatively were positive for TSHR-mRNA. The concordance between TSHR-mRNA and Tg-mRNA and between TSHR-mRNA and serum Tg was 95%. Fourteen patients with DTC (21%) had Tg antibodies, three with local disease (all positive for TSHR-mRNA), and 11 with no evidence of disease (all negative for TSHR-mRNA). Our results indicate that TSHR-mRNA and/or Tg-mRNA in peripheral blood are both equally sensitive and specific markers for monitoring thyroid cancer patients. Their principal value resides in the Tg antibody-positive patients in whom a positive or a negative mRNA value might have indicated or obviated the need for a whole-body scan. Furthermore, the high specificity combined with their ability to predict thyroid cancer preoperatively suggests a potential role in detecting thyroid cancer in patients with thyroid nodules.

RT-PCR for thyroglobulin (Tg) and TSH receptor (TSHR) mRNA has been used to detect circulating thyroid cancer cells. Little is known, however, regarding the preoperative sensitivity of this test to detect cancer. Seventy-two patients with thyroid disease (36 with malignancy and 36 with benign disease) were evaluated preoperatively. TSHR and Tg mRNA transcripts were detected by RT-PCR assays, previously determined to be specific for cancer cells. There was 100% concordance between TSHR and Tg mRNA RT-PCR results. Of 36 cancer patients, 11 had recurrent disease, and all were positive by RT-PCR. Among 25 patients with no prior thyroid surgery, 18 tested positive preoperatively (sensitivity 72%). Seven of 36 patients with benign disease tested positive (specificity 80%). The overall preoperative diagnostic accuracy was 77%. Preoperative fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed on 46 of 61 patients with no prior thyroid surgery. FNA was diagnostic in 28 (61%) patients. Preoperative cytology was adequate but not diagnostic in 18 (39%) patients. RT-PCR correctly classified 14 of these 18 patients with indeterminate FNA, and the test detected three of four cancer patients as positive (75% sensitive) and 11 of 14 patients (78% specific) with benign disease as negative. The combined diagnostic performance characteristics for RT-PCR and FNA cytology were sensitivity = 95%, specificity = 83%, and diagnostic accuracy = 89%, with positive and negative predictive values of 84 and 95%, respectively. Our results suggest that the molecular detection of circulating thyroid cancer cells by RT-PCR for TSHR/Tg mRNA complements FNA cytology in the preoperative differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid disease and their combined use may save unnecessary surgeries.

These data suggest that oocytes and embryos derived from patients with high preovulatory progesterone are not of a reduced quality. The association of high progesterone concentrations with a reduced rate of pregnancy varied with the type of luteal support.

Background: Antimicrobials are drugs that are often misused and inappropriate antimicrobial prescribing often results in poor clinical outcome and drug resistance. Monitoring and regulation of antimicrobial use is currently being done by the Department of Health through the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Program. There is a need to determine the factors that affect successful implementation of an AMS program in private hospitals in the Philippines. This study was conducted to identify the enablers and potential barriers in implementing an AMS program in nine (9) private hospitals. Methodology: A concurrent mixed methods design was used to assess various stakeholders’ (physicians, administrators, other AMS members) perceptions of existing or proposed AMS programs, and to identify barriers and enablers in their implementation. Quantitative data were collected using self-administered survey questionnaire to assess clinician’s acceptance of AMS programs. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured one-on-one interviews of clinicians and other AMS personnel and focus group discussions (FGD) of selected clinician groups. Data were gathered from October 2018 to October 2019. Results: 409 clinicians were surveyed, 52 were interviewed and 46 sat for 13 sessions of FGDs. Overall, the survey established that physicians were well aware of antimicrobial resistance problem. Majority of the clinicians indicated general agreement with the currently practiced antimicrobial protocols in their hospitals and with the AMS program. However, there were disagreements in perceptions with how antimicrobial restrictions impair prescribing practices and overuse of the same. These responses were strong points of discussion during the Key Informant Interviews (KII) and FGDs. All respondents were amenable with the institutionalization of an AMS program in their hospitals. The hospital leadership’s commitment was determined to be the key enabler of a successful AMS program’s implementation. Barriers identified for hospitals with existing AMS programs were: lack of dedicated staff, resistance and/or non-cooperation of physicians, lack of support from non-medical departments, and inadequate cooperation between hospital personnel. Barriers identified, regardless of the status of the AMS programs were: deficiency in knowledge with developing and implementing an AMS program, inadequate information dissemination, unavailability of an IT-based monitoring for antibiotic use, and the influence of pharmaceutical companies on stakeholders with regards to antimicrobial use. Conclusion: Similar enablers and barriers to a successful implementation of an AMS program were seen in the different hospitals. A hospital leadership’s commitment was determined to be the key enabler. The success or failure of any AMS program appears to depend on physician understanding, commitment and support for such a program. By involving the main players in an AMS program- the hospital administrators, clinicians and other key members, perceived barriers will be better identified and overcome, and enablers will help allow a successful implementation of an AMS program. This multi-center study was funded by Philippine Council on Health Research and Development ( PCHRD) and Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines ( PIDSP) and was conducted by the PIDSP Research Committee.

No abstract