Background: The incidence of rectal cancer is higher in the older population. In developed nations, there has been a rise in incidence in young onset colorectal cancer (CRC). We examined the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) in younger patients (yRC) compared with older patients, using a retrospective audit. Methods: All cases of LARC referred to two tertiary referral cancer centres in Western Sydney were examined. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, treatment, relapse free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were obtained. Under 50 years old was used as the cut-off age for defining yRC.Results: All 145 consecutive patients were treated for LARC, including 28 in the yRC and 117 in the older patient group. Median follow-up was 54 months. yRC were more likely to complete neoadjuvant therapy (100% vs. 86%; P=0.032) and to undergo more extensive surgical procedures (24% vs. 2%, P<0.0001). yRC were more likely to have microsatellite high (MSI) tumours (30% vs. 4.7%; P=0.003). yRC demonstrated significantly poorer RFS compared with the standard group (HR 2.79; median RFS 4.67 vs. 16.02 months; P=0.023). In the relapsed setting, yRC had poorer PFS compared with the standard group (median PFS 2.66 vs. 9.70, P=0.006, HR 3.04). A difference in OS was also seen between the two groups, with yRC demonstrating poorer OS (median OS 40.46 vs. 58.26 months, HR 3.48, P=0.036). Conclusions: Patients under 50 years with LARC are more likely to have MSI tumours with a more aggressive disease course and poorer RFS, PFS and OS. Initiatives to improve early detection of these patients may improve outcomes. Further research is necessary to understand this disease and optimise its treatment.
253 Background: In early and advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), there is limited data comparing the influence of mucinous (MAC) with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) histology on clinical outcomes. We investigated the association between histological type and outcomes in CRC. Methods: Medical records of patients with stage II, III and IV CRC referred to a tertiary centre in Western Sydney between 2009-2016 were examined and demographic and clinical information extracted. Key prognostic factors were modeled using log rank tests and proportional hazards (PH) regression methods in multivariate analyses. Results: Data on 686 patients was extracted. Median age was 70 years (19 – 94). Median follow up was 38.4 months. 98 patients (12%) had MAC and no differences in stage were observed at presentation between MAC and NMAC (p = 0.16). MAC was associated with increased prevalence of microsatellite instability (36% v 11% p < 0.01), high grade tumours (51% v 18% p < 0.01), female gender (61% v 45% p < 0.01) and right sided primary (65% v 40% p < 0.01). In stage II/III, MAC had comparable relapse free survival (RFS) versus NMAC (median 79 vs 97 months; P = 0.21). However, in the adjuvant chemotherapy group, a poorer RFS was seen for MAC (52 Vs 82 months, HR = 0.52, P = 0.03). In all patients with relapsed disease, MAC was more likely to be associated with peritoneal carcinomatosis (51% vs 26%; P < 0.01), and less likely to be associated with liver metastases (45% Vs 70%, P < 0.01) than NMAC. PH analysis of the MAC cohort revealed poorer RFS for LVI (HR 2.85; p = 0.03), T4 stage (HR 3.15, p = 0.01) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 5.49, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, T4 remained significant for poorer RFS. No differences were seen in OS in early stage CRC between MAC and NMAC. However, right sided and female gender with stage IV MAC had poorer OS (Right colon: HR 6.6; P = 0.03) (Female: HR 4.90, P = 0.03). Conclusions: MAC is associated with poorer RFS in early stage CRC irrespective of sidedness, and with poorer OS in right sided CRC. Given their poor response to adjuvant chemotherapy, novel adjuvant treatments should be considered for early MAC CRC. In the palliative setting, novel therapies and clinical trials are required for patients with MAC, particularly with right sided primaries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.