To study the extent to which persons with epilepsy feel stigmatized by the disorder, a sample of 445 individuals with epilepsy is analyzed. By first defining stigma in quantifiable terms and then by assessing the prevalence of stigma among the individuals studied, two alternative models that postulate the causes of stigma are investigated. The first model, a simple medical approach, assumes that because epilepsy is stigmatizing for an individual with the disorder, a direct relationship exists between the severity of the individual's seizure and the perception of stigma. The second model, a sociopsychological approach, assumes that the effects of seizure severity on the perception of stigma are mediated by other individual characteristics. The results of the study suggest, first, that persons with epilepsy do not universally feel stigmatized by the disorder. Second, by investigating the validity of these assumptions with regression and path analysis techniques, the findings support the premise of the sociopsychological model. The relationship between the severity of seizures and the perception of stigma due to the disorder is found to be highly dependent on other characteristics in the individual with epilepsy, such as the perception of employment discrimination, the perception of limitations imposed by the disorder, and the years of school attained by the individual.
Objectives: In Peru, current interventions in high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM) reach a limited number of this population because they rely solely on peer education. The objective of this study was to assess the use of the internet as an alternative tool to access this population. Methods: Two nearly identical banner ads-both advertising an online survey but only one offering free HIV/ syphilis tests and condoms-were displayed randomly on a Peruvian gay website. Results: The inclusion of the health incentive increased the frequency of completed surveys (5.8% vs 3.4% of delivered impressions; p,0.001), attracting high-risk MSM not previously tested for HIV but interested in a wide variety of preventive Web-based interventions. Eleven per cent (80/713) of participants who said they had completed the survey offering free testing visited our clinic: of those who attended, 6% had already been diagnosed as having HIV, while 5% tested positive for HIV. In addition, 8% tested positive for syphilis. Conclusions: The internet can be used as a tool to access MSM in Peru. The compensation of a free HIV/ syphilis test increased the frequency of participation in our online survey, indicating that such incentives may be an effective means of reaching this population. However, as only a small percentage of participants actually reported for testing, future research should develop and assess tailored internet interventions to increase HIV/STI testing and delivery of other prevention services to Peruvian MSM.
A 14-session cognitive-behavioral group counseling intervention designed to assist gay and bisexual males in reducing their risk of HIV transmission was evaluated in an experimental design. To overcome psychological and geographic barriers to serving individuals at risk, the counseling sessions and all data collection interviews were conducted via telephone. Participants had the option of enrolling anonymously, and a toll-free number was made available. At reassessment, treatment group participants were 80% less likely than controls to report any unprotected anal sex, and were nearly twice as likely to report some condom use with anal and oral sex. Treated participants also reported a significantly greater decline than controls in the proportion of anal sex acts that were unprotected by condoms. While those who were treated maintained a lower risk level over the year following treatment, their initial increase in condom utilization was not maintained. Delivering counseling interventions via the telephone, when coupled with the option for participating anonymously, holds considerable promise in overcoming barriers to reaching and effectively facilitating risk reduction in high-risk populations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.