The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of company’s characteristic which are profitability (ROA), leverage (DER), liquidity (CR), company size (SIZE), and corporate governance proxied by board of directors and audit committee (KA) to disclosure of sustainability reports (SR). The study had 105 samples of manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange and 262 manufacturing companies listed on Malaysia Exchange in year 2013-2015. Data analysis using regression logistic method with E-views version 9. Hypothesis testing results show that the partial results of hypothesis testing variable DER, CR, and Directors do not have significant effect on internet financial reporting, but ROA and SIZE have significant influence on sustainability report disclosure (SR) of manufacturing companies listed in IDX and Bursa Malaysia.

This research aimed to determine whether the environmental performance and Good Corporate Governance (GCG) mechanisms, such as managerial ownership, institutional ownership, the proportion of independent commissioners had effects of the audit committee on measured financial performance by using Return on Equity (ROE). This research population was manufacturing company listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange that participated in PROPER 2012PROPER /2013PROPER and 2013PROPER /2014. Based on the multiple regression analysis, audit committee partially had a significant effect on financial performance, while the others did not. Meanwhile, the analysis result shows that environmental performance and all GCG mechanisms simultaneously have significant effects on financial performance.

Objective– Rapid advances in financial technology have tremendously changed both the way of life and the way of doing business over recent decades. The ubiquitous usage of the internet is fostering new forms of enterprise. Mobile payment is a new way to conveniently and effectively conduct financial transactions through digital platforms. This study analyzes the factors influencing the adoption of mobile payments as a method of payment utilized by Generation Z. Generation Z represents the successor of the generation of our society and the generation that interacts the most with internet technology. Design/methodology– Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model, this study sampled 100 respondents of Generation Z from Jakarta and surrounding areas (JABODETABEK) and further analyzed using the Partial Least Square-Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM).  Results – The results show that factors relating to Performance Expectancy, Social Influences, Facilitating Condition, Perceived Enjoyment, and Trust significantly affect the Behavioral Intention to use mobile payments to conduct online transactions. Effort Expectancy shows no significant effect. Contribution – This study provided the evidence about the factors influencing the Generation Z’s intention behavior to adopt mobile payment technology as a tool in online purchasing, using the extended UTAUT model. This stems from extended UTAUT and applies it to explore how the Behavioral Intention of Generation Z in adopting mobile payment technology.

A company will always attempt to reach its goal by increasing its efficiency and effectiveness. One of the ways to achieve the goal is by improving its intellectual capital, good corporate governance and financial performance. This study was conducted with the aim of finding empirical evidence about the effect of intellectual capital and good corporate governance on firm’s financial performance measured by Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) in the consumer goods sector listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2014-2018. The sample used in this study was 23 companies that met several criteria. The data analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis. The results of hypothesis testing show that intellectual capital positively affected firm’s financial performance. In contrast, good corporate governance did not affect positively firm’s financial performance. Keywords:  intellectual capital; good corporate governance; Return on Assets (ROA); Return on Equity (ROE)  ABSTRAK Perusahaan akan selalu berupaya untuk mencapai tujuannya dengan meningkatkan efisiensi dan efektivitas perusahaan. Salah satu upaya dalam mencapai tujuan adalah dengan meningkatkan intellectual capital, good corporate governance, dan kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk memperoleh bukti empiris mengenai pengaruh intellectual capital dan good corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan yang diukur dengan Return on Assets (ROA) dan Return on Equity (ROE) pada sektor barang konsumsi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2014-2018. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah sebanyak 23 perusahaan yang memenuhi beberapa kriteria. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis regresi berganda. Hasil dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa intellectual capital memiliki pengaruh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan. Sebaliknya, good corporate governance tidak berpengaruh positif terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan.  Kata kunci:    intellectual capital; good corporate governance; Return on Assets (ROA); Return on Equity (ROE)

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which is proxied through: the proportion of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, quality audits, and family ownership on the cost of debt. The objects of this study are companies listed in Compass 100 period August 2013 January 2014. The method used to take samples of the study using purposive sampling method. Data analysis methods used are descriptive statistics, the classical assumption test, and hypotheses test. Based on the results of hypothesis testing that performed by using multiple regression analysis at the 0.05 significant level, the results of this study prove that the proportion of independent commissioners has a significant negative effect on the cost of debt. Managerial ownership has a positive significant effect on the cost of debt. Institutional ownership, quality audits, and family ownership has no significant effect the cost of debt.