Background
Antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 after mRNA or adenoviral vector based vaccines is weak in kidney transplant (KT) patients. However, few studies have focused on humoral response after inactivated virus-based vaccines in KT. Here, we compare antibody response following vaccination with inactivated virus (Coronavacࣨ) and BNT162b2 mRNA.
Methods
A national multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted. The study group was composed of patients from all KT centers in Uruguay, vaccinated between May 1st-May 31st (Coronavacࣨ n = 245 and BNT162b2 n = 39). Control group was constituted by 82 healthy individuals. Participants had no prior confirmed COVID-19 test. Blood samples were collected between 30 and 40 days after second dose. Serum specific IgG antibodies against Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein were determined using COVID-19 IgG QUANT ELISA Kit.
Results
Only 29% of KT recipients showed seroconversion [36.5% BNT162b2, 27.8% inactivated virus, p = 0.248] in comparison to 100% in healthy control with either vaccine. Antibody levels against RBD were higher with BNT162b mRNA than with inactivated virus [173 (73–554) and 29 (11–70) BAU/mL, p < 0.034] in KT and 10 times lower than healthy control [inactivated virus: 308 (209–335) and BNT162b2: 2638 (2608–3808) BAU/mL, p < 0.034]. In multivariate analysis, variables associated with negative humoral response were age, triple immunosuppression, eGFR and time post-KT.
Conclusion
Seroconversion was low in KT patients after vaccination with both platforms. Antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 were lower with inactivated virus than BNT162b mRNA. These findings support the need of strategies to improve immunogenicity in KT recipients after two doses of either vaccine.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.