Background-Atheroembolic renal disease (AERD) is caused by showers of cholesterol crystals released by eroded atherosclerotic plaques. Embolization may occur spontaneously or after angiographic/surgical procedures. We sought to determine clinical features and prognostic factors of AERD. Methods and Results-Incident cases of AERD were enrolled at multiple sites and followed up from diagnosis until dialysis and death. Diagnosis was based on clinical suspicion, confirmed by histology or ophthalmoscopy for all spontaneous forms and for most iatrogenic cases. Cox regression was used to model time to dialysis and death as a function of baseline characteristics, AERD presentation (acute/subacute versus chronic renal function decline), and extrarenal manifestations. Three hundred fifty-four subjects were followed up for an average of 2 years. They tended to be male (83%) and elderly (60% Ͼ70 years) and to have cardiovascular diseases (90%) and abnormal renal function at baseline (83%). AERD occurred spontaneously in 23.5% of the cases. During the study, 116 patients required dialysis, and 102 died. Baseline comorbidities, ie, reduced renal function, presence of diabetes, history of heart failure, acute/subacute presentation, and gastrointestinal tract involvement, were significant predictors of event occurrence.

To verify the hypothesis that angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors possess a unique renoprotective effect in progressive chronic renal disease, we decided to compare the effects of an ACE inhibitor and a calcium antagonist on both hypertension and the progression of non-diabetic renal insufficiency in a long-term study. A four-year, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial was conducted on 142 hypertensive patients (pts) with established chronic renal failure from six Italian nephrology departments. They were on standard antihypertensive therapy with a low-protein diet and underwent twice-monthly surveillance for a one year pre-randomization period. After that year, 121 pts were randomly allocated to captopril or slow-release nifedipine therapies for a three-year study period. The progression of renal insufficiency was monitored every two months. Blood pressure control was significantly better after randomization than during the year of standard antihypertensive therapy. The progression rate before randomization (BR) was definitely higher before than after randomization (AR): Creatinine clearance (CCr) change BR = -0.46 +/- 0.45 ml/min/month, creatinine clearance change AR = -0.23 +/- 0.43 ml/min/month (P less than 0.01). After randomization, the mean blood pressure values were virtually the same throughout the three year period of the study in the two groups treated by captopril (group I), or nifedipine (group II).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

It is not the K+ dialysis removal alone that can be destabilizing from an electrophysiological standpoint, but rather its removal dynamics. This is all the more evident in patients with arrhythmias who benefit from the K+ profiling during their dialysis treatment.

No abstract

Although hemodiafiltration (HDF) offers the advantage of increased convective clearance for middle molecules, there is still controversy as to whether reinfusion should occur pre- or post-filter. Mid-dilution hemodiafiltration (MD HDF) is a new HDF technique that uses a special dialyzer, MD190, which allows both pre- and post-reinfusion. While externally the dialyzer looks similar to conventional hemodialyzers, the internal fibers are divided into two bundles by a special annular header that first lets the blood pass through the peripheral bundle in post-dilution, mix with the reinfusion fluid at the opposite end of the dialyzer and then proceed (after pre-dilution) to the dialyzer blood exit. The dialyzer is able to support substantially higher reinfusion rates (10-12 l/h). We have compared the removal characteristics of several small solutes and larger middle-molecular-weight toxins by examining instantaneous clearance at 45 min, the dialysis reduction ratio and total mass removal (by spilling) in a three-center prospective cross-over study. Twenty patients were randomized to a treatment sequence of one-week high-flux bicarbonate hemodialysis (HD) followed by MD HDF, or vice versa. The parameters evaluated included urea, creatinine, beta2-microglobulin, angiogenin, leptin, retinol-binding protein, and the effects on sodium, potassium, bicarbonate and calcium. Blood flow rates ranged between 300-450 ml/min (mean 359 +/- 44 HD, 367 +/- 35 MD HDF). The mean reinfusion for MD HDF was 166 +/-17 ml/min. MD HDF had a significantly better instantaneous clearance for urea (328 +/- 28 vs 277 +/- 40); creatinine (292 +/- 32 vs. 212 +/- 66); phosphate (324 +/- 38 vs. 242 +/- 63); beta2-microglobulin (249 +/- 27 vs. 100 +/- 24); angiogenin (173 +/- 27 vs. 28 +/- 32); and leptin (202 +/- 29 vs. 63 +/- 43). Treatments were well tolerated with no adverse reactions occurring during any of the treatments. The MD HDF filter's unique configuration is designed to deliver high-efficiency HDF with a significant improvement in small and middle molecule removal. MD HDF supports substantially higher ultrafiltration rates, and as such, results in a higher removal of middle-molecular-weight toxins.