Two new penta-and tetrasubstituted cyclopentenones, named phaseocyclopentenones A and B (1 and 2), together with guignardone A (3), were isolated from Macrophomina phaseolina cultures. The phytopathogenic fungus was isolated from infected soybean tissues showing charcoal rot symptoms in Argentina. Charcoal rot is a devastating disease considering that soybean is one of the main legumes cultivated in the world. Phaseocyclopentenones A and B were characterized by 1D and 2D 1 H and 13 C NMR spectroscopic and HRESIMS spectrometric data and chemical methods as 4-benzoyl-3,4,5-trihydroxy-2-phenylcyclopent-2enone and 3,5-dihydroxy-2,4-diphenylcyclopent-2-enone, respectively. The relative configuration of phaseocyclopentenones A and B was assigned by 1 H and NOESY NMR methods, while their absolute configurations were assigned by electronic circular dichroism methods. When assayed on a nonhost plant (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by the leaf puncture assay, phaseocyclopentenones A and B and guignardone A showed phytotoxic activity, while only 1 and 2 were toxic when tested on cuttings of the same plant. No phytotoxicity or antifungal activity was detected for the three compounds on the host plant soybean (Glycine max L.) and against some of its fungal pathogens, namely, Cercospora nicotianae and Colletotrichum truncatum, also isolated from infected soybean plants in Argentina.

A new sesquiterpenoid belonging to the subgroup seco-eudesmanolides and named inuloxin E was isolated from Dittrichia viscosa, together with the already known sesquiterpenoids inuloxins A–D and α-costic acid. Inuloxin E was characterized by spectroscopic data (essentially NMR and ESI MS) as 3-methylene-6-(1-methyl-4-oxo-pentyl)-3a,4,7,7a-tetrahydro-3H-benzofuran-2-one. Its relative configuration was determined by comparison with the closely related inuloxin D and chemical conversion of inuloxin E into inuloxin D and by the observed significant correlation in the NOESY spectrum. Both inuloxins D and E induced germination of the parasitic weed Orobanche cumana, but were inactive on the seeds of Orobanche minor and Phelipanche ramosa. The germination activity of some hemisynthetic esters of inuloxin D was also investigated.

Two new bioactive ophiobolan sestertepenoids, named drophiobiolins A and B (1 and 2) were isolated from Drechslera gigantea, a fungus proposed as a mycoherbicide for biocontrol of Digitaria sanguinalis. They were isolated together with ophiobolin A, the main metabolite, 6-epi-ophiobolin A, 3-anhydro-6-epi-ophiobolin A, and ophiobolin I. Drophiobolins A and B were characterized by NMR, HRESIMS, and chemical methods as 7-hydroxy-7-(6-hydroxy-6-methylheptan-2-yl)-1,9a-dimethyl-3-oxo-3,3a,6,6a,7,8,9,9a,10,10a-decahydrodicyclopenta [a,d]­[8]­annulene-4-carbaldehyde and 6-(hydroxymethyl)-3′,9,10a-trimethyl-5′-(2-methylprop-1-en-1-yl)-3a,4,4′,5′,10,10a-hexahydro-1H,3′H-spiro­[dicyclopenta­[a,d] [8]­annulene-3,2′-furan]-5,7­(2H,9aH)-dione. The relative configuration of drophiobolins A and B, which did not afford crystals suitable for X-ray analysis, was determined by NOESY experiments, while the absolute configuration was assigned by comparison of their experimental and TDDFT calculated electronic circular dichroism (ECD) spectra. The phytotoxic activity of drophiobolins A and B was tested by leaf-puncture assay on cultivated (Lycopersicon esculentum L.), as well as on host (Digitaria sanguinalis L.) and nonhost (Chenopodium album L.) weed plants, compared to that of ophiobolin A. Both of the newly identified ophiobolins showed significant phytotoxicity. Drophiobolins A and B exhibited cytotoxicity against Hela B cells with an IC50 value of 10 μM. However, they had a lesser or no effect against Hacat, H1299, and A431 cells when compared to that of ophiobolin A.

Sesquitepenoids inuloxins A–D, belonging to different subgroups, were isolated from Dittrichia viscosa and showed potential biocontrol of some parasitic plants as Pelipanche, Orobanche, and Cuscuta species. The absolute configurations of the first three inuloxins A–C were previously determined by using experimental and computational chiroptical spectroscopic methods. The absolute configuration of inuloxin D remains to be established. The bioactive inuloxin E, closely related to inuloxin D, was recently isolated from the same plant organic extract. The same relative configuration of inuloxin D was assigned to inuloxin E by comparison of their NMR spectroscopic data. The absolute configurations of inuloxin D and inuloxin E are suggested in this work by analysis of the experimental and predicted chiroptical properties of the 4‐O‐acetyl derivative of inuloxin D.