This study shows that microsurgical skills of male and female medical students are similar. Equal opportunities in the eventual pursuit of the surgical specialties should be available regardless of gender.

Background We aimed to compare different methods to treat lower leg soft tissue defects with tibia fracture using free flaps and pedicled flaps. We also highlighted the aesthetic outcome after using 1-stage secondary debulking procedure for tibia area. Patients and Methods From December 2000 to March 2017, 83 patients with lower leg defects and tibia fractures were reconstructed using 71 free flaps and 12 pedicled flaps. One-stage secondary debulking procedures were performed for 39 patients after flap reconstruction. Infection control and aesthetic outcomes using 5-point Likert scale were reviewed after a 16-month follow-up. Results Twenty-five myocutaneous free flaps, 45 fasciocutaneous free flaps, 1 fibula free flap, 12 pedicled flaps of which 8 were distally based sural artery flaps, and 4 medial gastrocnemius flaps were used. The flap survival rate was 100%. There was no recurrence of osteomyelitis in any patient after reconstruction with any of these flaps. Using a 5-point Likert scale, performance of a 1-stage secondary debulking procedure showed statistically significant difference in terms of contour, color, and texture compared with the group without debulking procedure. Conclusions The use of free flaps and pedicled flaps in the reconstruction of lower leg defects with tibia fracture is reliable and results in good infection control. A 1-stage secondary debulking procedure delivers excellent long-term aesthetic outcome after reconstruction of the tibia area.

No abstract