Objective. To compare the results and repeatability of the corneal thickness (CT) and epithelial thickness (ET) maps provided by Swept-Source-Optical Coherence Tomography with those of Spectral-Domain-OCT in normal eyes. Methods. 30 normal eyes of 30 patients were assessed by 3 trained operators with SS-OCT and SD-OCT. Results. The central and minimum ET obtained with both devices were correlated: central ET, r = 0.86, p < 0.05 ; minimum ET, r = 0.72, p < 0.05 . Compared with SD-OCT, SS-OCT tended to underestimate these figures by 1.4 and 1.9 μm on average. The central and minimum CT obtained with both devices were strongly correlated: central CT, r = 0.994, p < 0.05 ; minimum CT, r = 0.995, p < 0.05 . SS-OCT tended to overestimate these figures by 11 and 14 μm on average. Repeatability was good for both devices with a mean coefficient of variation of measurements <6% for ET and <2% for CT. Interoperator variability (standard deviation and COV) was significantly higher for SS-OCT than for SD-OCT for all local epithelial thicknesses and significantly lower for the central CT and several local corneal thicknesses, whereas no significant differences between both technologies were found for the central and minimum ET and the minimum CT. Conclusion. SS-OCT and SD-OCT provide reproducible measurements of CT and ET in normal corneas with a strong correlation between both technologies. However, both technologies are not interchangeable when the main thickness parameters (i.e., central and minimum CT and minimum ET) are used for diagnosing early keratoconus or calculating the expected residual stromal bed thickness before corneal refractive surgery or anterior lamellar keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: To assess epithelial corneal remodeling by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) after intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation in keratoconic eyes. METHODS: This prospective observational study included patients with keratoconus receiving ICRS of different arc lengths according to their tomographic pattern. AS-OCT and corneal topography (Scheimpflug camera) were performed before and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Corneal pachymetry mapping was performed and total corneal and epithelial thicknesses (3-mm central and 16 points on 6-mm zone) were measured over the pupil center using AS-OCT. Topographic parameters were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 68 keratoconic eyes were analyzed (Amsler-Krumeich stages 1 to 4) in four groups of 17 eyes: 210° ICRS, 320° ICRS, double 160° ICRS, and single 160° ICRS. Corneal pachymetry mapping revealed that epithelial thickness increased significantly in the internal zones juxtaposed to the ICRS without smoothing during the postoperative period ( P < .05). Mean maximum epithelial thickness increased from 67 ± 6 to 79 ± 7 µm for 210° ICRS, 66 ± 9 to 82 ± 4 µm for 320° ICRS, 63 ± 6 to 78 ± 7 µm for double 160° ICRS, and 62 ± 5 to 77 ± 5 µm for single 160° ICRS ( P < .0001). Significant epithelial thickening at the apex of the cone was observed in all groups ( P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Significant epithelial thickening occurs after ICRS implantation adjacent to the ICRS to compensate for the ridge created with a thickening of epithelium over the cone due to regularization of the stromal surface. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(6):404–413.]

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes obtained with models of asymmetric and non-asymmetric intracorneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconic eyes with asymmetric topo-graphic patterns. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, ICRS were implanted alternately in patients with the same tomographic patterns of keratoconus assigned to four groups. Patients with the “duck” phenotype received one asymmetric or non-asymmetric ICRS and patients with the “snowman” pheno-type received two asymmetric or non-asymmetric ICRS. Visual, refractive, astigmatism, keratometric, and corneal aberrometry changes were evaluated over a 6-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes were analyzed. No significant difference was observed between the use of one asymmetric and one non-asymmetric ICRS in duck phenotypes. In snowman keratoconus, the inferior-superior index decreased significantly ( P = .03) with asymmetric but not with non-asymmetric ICRS implantation. Total corneal higher order aberrations and coma rates were lower, but not significantly so, after the implantation of two asymmetric ICRS in snowman phenotypes (2.85 ± 0.89 to 2.60 ± 0.91 µm, P = .20 and 2.64 ± 0.93 to 2.39 ± 0.98 µm, P = .21), and significantly higher after the implantation of two non-asymmetric ICRS (2.56 ± 1.28 to 3.08 ± 1.62 µm, P = .02 and 2.34 ± 1.27 to 2.84 ± 1.62 µm, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Asymmetric ICRS did not improve the outcomes of ICRS implantation in duck keratoconus. However, the implantation of two asymmetric ICRS was more effective than that of two non-asymmetric ICRS for decreasing vertical asymmetry and preventing increases in corneal aberration in the snowman phenotype of keratoconus. [ J Refract Surg . 2021;37(8):552–561.]

No abstract

Purpose: To investigate the outcomes of accelerated (A-CXL) and iontophoresis (I-CXL) corneal crosslinking in a large retrospective cohort with progressive keratoconus. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included consecutive patients treated by A-CXL (9 mW/5.4 J/cm2) or I-CXL with a minimal follow-up of 12 months. Visual acuity, manifest refraction, topography, specular microscopy, and corneal optical coherence tomography (OCT) were evaluated at baseline and at the last visit. Progression was defined as an increase in the maximum topographic keratometry (Kmax) of 1D. Results: 302 eyes of 241 patients with a mean age of 25.2 ± 7.5 years were included from 2012 to 2019: 231 and 71 eyes in the A-CXL and I-CXL groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 27.2 ± 13.2 months (maximum: 85.7 months). Preoperatively, the mean Kmax was 51.8 ± 4.0D, with no differences between groups. Mean topographic measurements and spherical equivalent remained stable during the follow-up. At the last visit, CXL failure was reported in 60 eyes (19.9%): 40 (14.7%) versus 20 (28.2%) in A-CXL versus I-CXL, respectively, p = 0.005. The likelihood of progression after CXL was significantly higher following I-CXL: RR = 1.62, CI95 = [1.02 to 2.59], p = 0.04. Demarcation line presence at 1 month was positively correlated with higher efficacy of CXL, p = 0.03. No endothelial damage was reported, especially in 51 thin corneas (range = 342–399 µm). Conclusions: A-CXL seems more effective than I-CXL in stabilizing keratoconus; this is to be taken into account when a therapeutic indication is posed according to the aggressiveness of the keratoconus.