Objective: To compare outcomes at 28 days and 1 year between patients admitted to hospital and those discharged after presenting to the emergency department (ED) with transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Design and setting: All TIA presentations to EDs in a large metropolitan and rural region of Sydney and its surroundings, New South Wales, between 2001 and 2005 were extracted from state health department databases and followed up over 1 year. Admission and discharge data and subsequent TIA or stroke presentations were identified. Main outcome measures: TIA recurrence or stroke. Results: Of 2535 presentations to an ED with TIA during the 5‐year period, 1816 patients were admitted to hospital (71.6%) and 719 were discharged from the ED (28.4%). At 28 days, the discharged group had significantly higher rates of recurrence than the admitted group for all events (TIA or stroke) (5.3% v 2.3%, P < 0.001), stroke (2.1% v 0.7%, P = 0.002), and recurrent TIA (3.2% v 1.6%, P = 0.01). During the 29–365‐day follow‐up period, there was no significant difference between the discharged and admitted groups for all events (4.2% v 5.1%; P = 0.37), stroke (1.3% v 2.5%; P = 0.06) or recurrent TIA (2.9% v 2.6%; P = 0.65). Conclusion: Patients with an ED diagnosis of TIA may benefit from admission to hospital through a reduced risk of early stroke.

Background: The interplay between collateral status and stroke aetiology may be crucial in the evaluation and management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Our understanding of this relationship and its level of association remains sub-optimal. This study sought to examine the association of pre-intervention collateral status with stroke aetiology, specifically large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and cardio-embolism (CE), in AIS patients receiving reperfusion therapy, by performing a meta-analysis. Methods: Relevant search terms were explored on Medline/PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases. Studies were included using the following inclusion criteria: (a) patients aged 18 or above; (b) AIS patients; (c) patients receiving reperfusion therapy; (d) total cohort size of >20, and (e) qualitative or quantitative assessment of pre-intervention collateral status on imaging using a grading scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to investigate the association of aetiology with pre-intervention collateral status, and forest plots of risk ratio (RR) were generated. Results: A meta-analysis was conducted on seven studies, with a cumulative cohort of 1235 patients, to assess the association of pre-intervention collateral status with stroke aetiology. Patients with LAA were associated significantly with an increased rate of good collaterals (RR 1.24; 95% CI 1.04–1.50; p = 0.020, z = 2.33). Contrarily, CE aetiology was associated significantly with a decreased rate of good collaterals (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71–0.98; p = 0.027, z = −2.213). Conclusions: This study demonstrates that, in AIS patients receiving reperfusion therapy, LAA and CE aetiologies are associated significantly with collateral status.