No abstract

Whether statin use has any impact on survival of esophageal cancer patients remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis focusing on current topic for the first time. We systematically searched the following databases for relevant studies comparing survival between statin users and non-users among esophageal cancer patients up to March 16, 2019: Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science. We extracted data of hazard ratio (HR) with 95%confidence interval (CI) of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality for analysis. We used the STATA 12.0 software to perform this meta-analysis. We finally included a total of 4 cohort studies involving a total of 20,435 esophageal cancer patients (5319 statin users and 15116 non-users). Our meta-analysis found that statin use after diagnosis of esophageal cancer was significantly correlated to decreased all-cause (random effects: HR = 0.81, 95%CI: 0.75–0.89, P < .001; I 2 = 68.1%) and cancer-specific mortality (fixed effects: HR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.78–0.89, P < .001; I 2 = 46.6%) in esophageal cancer patients. When stratified by pathological subtypes, the protective effect of statin use after diagnosis of esophageal cancer was observed in both esophageal adenocarcinoma patients and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. Moreover, statin use before diagnosis of esophageal cancer was also confirmed to have favorable survival benefit for esophageal cancer patients. Statin use was significantly correlated to lower mortality risk of esophageal cancer patients regardless of the time when statins were taken and pathological subtypes of esophageal cancer. Statins may serve as promising adjunctive anticancer agents for treating esophageal cancer.

No abstract

Whether age has any impact on the risk of lymph node (LN) metastasis in patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to objectively compare the risk of LN metastasis between elderly and young patients so as to justify for age-different extent of surgical resection for treating these patients. We retrospectively collected clinical data of patients undergoing lobectomy or segmentectomy with systematic hilar and mediastinal LN dissection for clinical stage IA peripheral NSCLC from January 2015 to December 2018. Both multivariate logistic regression analysis and propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were applied to compare the risk of LN metastasis between elderly (>65 years old) and young (≤65 years old) patients. We finally included a total of 590 patients for analysis (142 elderly patients and 448 young patients). In the analysis of unmatched cohorts, young patients tended to have higher rates of hilar/intrapulmonary LN (13.4% VS 9.2%) and mediastinal LN metastasis (10.5% VS 6.3%) than elderly patients. In the multivariate analysis, age was found to be an independent predictor of both hilar/intrapulmonary (Odds ratio(OR) = 2.065, 95%confidence interval(CI): 1.049-4.064, P = 0.036) and mediastinal (OR = 2.400, 95%CI: 1.083-5.316, P = 0.031) LN metastasis. Moreover, in the analysis of well-matched cohorts generated by PSM analysis, young patients had significantly higher rates of hilar/intrapulmonary (18.8% VS 9.4%, P = 0.039) and mediastinal LN metastasis (17.1% VS 6.0%, P = 0.008) than elderly patients. Therefore, age remains to be an independent predictor of LN metastasis in early-stage NSCLC and age-different extent of surgical resection may be justified for these patients. Lung cancer has become the leading cause of cancer and cancer-related death worldwide 1 .There are two major types of lung cancer, namely small cell lung cancer(SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC), of which NSCLC accounted for about 85% 2. With the advancement of computed tomography (CT), more and more early-stage NSCLCs are being found 3,4. For the management of early-stage NSCLC, anatomic lung resection with systematic lymph node (LN) dissection (SLND) or sampling is recommended as the preferred option in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline 5. However, the extent of lung resection and lymphadenectomy for treating early-stage NSCLC depends largely on the characteristics of tumors such as tumor size, status of LN metastasis, histology as well as ground glass consistency 6 and the patient's physiological conditions. It is reported that the age at diagnosis for majority of early-stage NSCLC patients falls into the range from 65 to 79 years old 7 and the number of elderly patients continues to increase with the aging population. Moreover, significant difference of baseline characteristics between elderly and young lung cancer patients was observed 8. However, current guideline still recommends the same surgical strategies for elderly and young patients except fo...

SUMMARY Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most common comorbidities in esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy. It is well established that DM has an unfavorable impact on short-term outcomes of patients with surgically treated esophageal cancer; however, whether DM has any impact on long-term survival of these patients remains unclear. We performed the first meta-analysis to investigate the impact of DM on survival of surgically treated esophageal cancer patients. We searched the following databases systematically to retrieve relevant studies on January 2, 2019: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The main outcome data consisting of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and hazard ratios (HRs) of OS were extracted to compare survival between patients with and without DM. We finally included for meta-analysis a total of eight cohort studies involving 5,044 esophageal cancer patients who underwent esophagectomy. We found no significant difference between 3-year (risk ratio [RR] = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.73–1.21; P = 0.65) and 5-year (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.80–1.08; P = 0.31) OS rates between patients with and without DM after esophagectomy. Moreover, DM was not found to be an independent predictor of OS for these patients (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.65–1.84; P = 0.72). Our study suggests that DM appears to have no significant impact on long-term survival of esophageal cancer patients who undergo esophagectomy. To improve the prognosis of these patients, it may be more important to control glycemic level in patients with DM who undergo esophagectomy. However, further high-quality studies with appropriate adjustment for confounding factors are needed to verify this conclusion.