Differences in interest in decision making are one of the things that must be facilitated in decision support applications. The most basic difference of interest in decision making is the difference in the weight of the importance of each criterion used. Each decision maker has their own interest in the criteria used. If these differences can be facilitated properly, the resulting decision recommendations can be optimal, in this case more in line with the interests of the users. The model is designed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Simple Additive Weight (SAW) methods, using 5 criteria. The final result of the AHP method is in the form of criteria weights that are in accordance with the interests of decision makers and in accordance with the consistency of the comparisons that have been given. The resulting weight will be used in the final calculation of SAW, namely in the calculation of alternative weights. By using AHP, the weight of the criteria becomes more subjective according to the interests of decision makers. Thus, the resulting alternative recommendations become more optimal because they are in accordance with the needs of decision makers.

This journal discusses the problem of using foreign language as an amplifier of Indonesian language literacy. This journal aims to find out the benefits of the application of a foreign language, in this case English for Indonesian literacy works, especially in the Indonesian Language Education Study Program FKIP UNS. Data in the form of documents were analyzed using qualitative descriptive techniques. The purpose of this study is to show the importance of foreign languages in Indonesian language literacy. The results show that the role of foreign languages in Indonesian language literacy is useful in; (a) support reference sources in Indonesian language literacy, and (b) improve foreign language skills as a provision for knowledge.

The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the rules of writing format in several journals in Indonesia, namely Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Literacy Pens and (2) find manifestations of the different writing formats and shell styles in the journal. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The object of this research are several scientific journals in Indonesia, namely Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Pen Literacy. The data collection technique used in this study is referring to obtaining data by listening to the use of the writing format in the journal and the style of the environment used. The results of the analysis and discussion of the differences in writing formats and confinement styles in the Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Pen Literacy journals can be concluded that there are differences in writing formats and confinement styles in each journal that are influenced by the policies of the journal parties concerned. This article is intended as knowledge for writers, especially beginner writers in writing journal articles to find out the format desired by a journal page. This is as a condition for a journal article to be posted on the journal's page. The results of journal articles indicate that there are differences and similarities between the five journals.

The objectives of this study are (1) to describe the rules of writing format in several journals in Indonesia, namely Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Literacy Pens and (2) find manifestations of the different writing formats and shell styles in the journal. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research. The object of this research are several scientific journals in Indonesia, namely Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Pen Literacy. The data collection technique used in this study is referring to obtaining data by listening to the use of the writing format in the journal and the style of the environment used. The results of the analysis and discussion of the differences in writing formats and confinement styles in the Rhetoric, Articulation, Salingka, Litera, and Pen Literacy journals can be concluded that there are differences in writing formats and confinement styles in each journal that are influenced by the policies of the journal parties concerned. This article is intended as knowledge for writers, especially beginner writers in writing journal articles to find out the format desired by a journal page. This is as a condition for a journal article to be posted on the journal's page. The results of journal articles indicate that there are differences and similarities between the five journals.

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah (1) mendeskripsikan aturan format penulisan pada beberapa jurnal di Indonesia, yaitu Retorika, Artikulasi, Salingka, Litera, dan Pena Literasi dan (2) menemukan wujud perbedaan format penulisan serta gaya selingkung pada jurnal. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualit atif deskriptif. Objek penelitian ini adalah beberapa jurnal ilmiah di Indonesia yaitu Retorika, Artikulasi, Salingka, Litera, dan Pena Literasi. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah teknik simak untuk memperoleh data dengan menyimak penggunaan format penulisan pada jurnal dan gaya selingkung yang digunakan. Hasil analisis dan pembahasan mengenai perbedaan format penulisan dan gaya selingkung pada jurnal Retorika, Artikulasi, Salingka, Litera, dan Pena Literasi dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan format penulisan dan gaya selingkung pada masing-masing jurnal yang dipengaruhi oleh kebijakan pihak jurnal yang bersangkutan. Artikel ini ditujukan sebagai pengetahuan bagi penulis, khususnya penulis pemula dalam menulis artikel jurnal untuk mengetahui format yang dikehendaki oleh sebuah laman jurnal. Hal ini sebagai syarat sebuah artikel jurnal dimuat pada laman jurnal tersebut. Hasil artikel jurnal menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan dan persamaan antara kelima jurnal.