Matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MMP-1) degrades cartilage, which may result in osteoarthritis (OA) development. Several studies have explored the association between MMP-1 gene rs1799750 polymorphism and OA in different populations. However, the results are inconsistent. The aim of this case–control study was to investigate the association between MMP-1 gene rs1799750 polymorphism and knee OA in a Chinese population. The present study included 308 cases and 404 controls. Genotyping was performed using standard polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism. The present study found that 2G2G genotype (2G2G vs 1G1G: OR & 95% CI, 2.28 (1.47–3.53), P<0.001; 2G2G + 1G2G vs 1G1G: OR & 95% CI, 1.61 (1.15–2.24), P=0.005; 2G2G vs 1G2G + 1G1G: OR & 95% CI, 1.84 (1.26–2.68), P=0.002) or 2G allele carriers (2G vs 1G: OR & 95% CI, 1.48 (1.20–1.83), P<0.001) of MMP-1 gene rs1799750 polymorphism increased the risk of OA. In conclusion, this case–control study confirms that MMP-1 gene rs1799750 polymorphism increases the risk of knee OA in Chinese Han population.

Maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a priority strategy. However, which medicine is chosen is controversial. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of maintenance treatment with metronomic capecitabine vs observation. In this randomized controlled trial, patients who completed 18 weeks of induction chemotherapy with XELOX and achieved disease control were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) to receive maintenance therapy with metronomic chemotherapy or observation until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival from randomization; secondary endpoints included overall survival and safety. Analyses were performed by intention to treat. Between January 1st, 2017 and December 31th 2018, 48 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive maintenance treatment with metronomic capecitabine (n = 25) or only observation (n = 23). The median progression-free survival in the metronomic capecitabine group was 5.66 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.25–6.07) months vs 3.98 (95%CI 3.71–4.24) months in the observation group (hazard ratio 0.11, 95% [CI] 0.04–0.26, P = .000). There was no statistically significant difference in median overall survival: 23.82 (95% CI 22.38–25.25) months in the metronomic capecitabine group vs 21.81 (95% CI 20.23–23.38) months in the observation group (hazard ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.21–1.11, P = .087). Subgroup analyses were generally consistent with the primary finding. Similar safety profiles were observed in both arms. The most frequent adverse events in metronomic capecitabine group included neutropenia, diarrhea, hand-foot skin reaction, and mucositis. Maintenance therapy with metronomic capecitabine can be considered an alternative option following first-line chemotherapy of XELOX in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with controlled toxicities.

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), a key gene that contributes to the susceptibility and clinical course of cancer, is an important down-regulator of T cell activation and proliferation. The +49A/G polymorphism is commonly studied because of its association with cancer risks. However, other polymorphisms, such as -1722T/C and -1661A/G, have not been studied in detail. We performed a meta-analysis using 43 eligible case-control studies with a total of 19,089 patients and 21,388 controls to examine the association between CTLA-4 +49A/G, -1722T/C, and -1661A/G polymorphisms and cancer risk. We searched the PubMed and EMBASE databases for all articles published up to July 17, 2013. Individuals with the +49 A allele (AA/AG vs. GG, odds ratio (OR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.16-1.27) and -1661 G allele (AG/GG vs. AA, OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.34-1.73) had increased cancer risk. However, no significant association between cancer risk and the -1722T/C polymorphism was found (CC/CT vs. TT, OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.92-1.16). In subgroup analysis for the +49A/G polymorphism, increased cancer risk remained in the subgroups of Asians (OR = 1.25, 95 % CI = 1.18-1.31), patients with breast cancer (OR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.15-1.42), and patients with lung cancer (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI = 1.07-1.35). For the -1661A/G polymorphism, increased cancer risk remained in the subgroups of Asians (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.34-1.73), patients with breast cancer (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.07-2.03), and patients with oral cancer (OR = 3.16, 95% CI = 1.84-5.45). However, no significant increase in cancer risk was found in the subgroups for the -1722T/C polymorphism. In conclusion, the results suggest that +49A/G and -1661A/G polymorphisms in CTLA-4 are risk factors for cancers, whereas the -1722T/C polymorphism is not associated with an increased risk of cancer.

No abstract