BackgroundPrecision cancer medicine-related rashes are a kind of skin and mucous lesions caused by precision therapy. More and more evidences indicated that such events should not be ignored in the course of anti-tumor therapy. Since cancer treatment entered the “Precision Era”, there has been a rapid increase in this field. However, there was few bibliometric studies to provide an overall review of this field. This study aims to evaluate the literature output and trends in researches on precision cancer medicine-related rashes from a global perspective.MethodsCollected publications on precision cancer medicine-related rashes from the Web of Science Core Collection database, which were limited to articles and reviews in English. Microsoft Excel, VOS viewer and CiteSpace V were used for quantitative and visual analysis.ResultsA total of 1,229 papers were identified. From 2008 to 2021, annual publications increased year by year. The United States published the most papers in this field (44.9%) and ranking first in citation frequency (19,854 times) and H-index (69). The University of Texas system ranks first with 98 papers published. Lacouture M.E and Robert C were the principal investigators. Cancers has the largest number of articles published, with 70 articles. In recent years, there have been research hotspots related to immunotherapy, including ipilimumab, immunotherapy, tumor microenvironment, association, checkpoint inhibitor, and cutaneous adverse event.ConclusionPrecision cancer medicine-related rashes are a hot research topic in oncology. The number of relevant publications will increase dramatically. “Checkpoint inhibitors”, “skin adverse events”, “associations” and “tumor microenvironment” may become research hotspots in the future.

Immune-related cutaneous adverse events (irCAEs) in patients treated with programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors may be associated with better clinical outcomes. However, the extent to which these results can be extrapolated to all tumour types remains unclear. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis of patients with cancer receiving anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, to determine the cumulative incidence of irCAEs and their association with survival. We systematically searched six databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, CNKI, CSPD, and CQVIP database) for all cohort studies reporting the relationship between irCAEs and patient survival from the time of database construction to 1 November, 2020. The primary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), with complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) as secondary outcomes. Patients with irCAEs exhibited higher ORR, and were more likely to report CR and PR and less likely to develop PD than those who did not experience irCAEs. Moreover, the occurrence of irCAEs was significantly associated with both favourable PFS and OS. Therefore, patients with irCAEs have better survival benefit and a significantly lower risk of tumour progression or death. Hence, the occurrence of irCAEs may be a useful marker for predicting the clinical efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.