Background: Studies have shown that the spherical shape of the lateral femoral condyle has a clear relationship with the relative axial movement of tibiofemoral joint and the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. The purpose of this study was to describe the distal curvature of the lateral femoral condyle by ratio of height of lateral femoral condyle to anteroposterior diameter (HAPR), and evaluate its correlation with ACL rupture. Methods: A retrospective case-control study of 64 patients was conducted. Two age-and sex-matched cohorts (each n = 32) were analyzed: primary ACL ruptures, and a control group consisting of isolated meniscal tears. On the radiograph, the distance from the intersection of the axis of the distal femur and the anteriorly diameter of the lateral femoral condyle to the lower point of the lateral femoral condyle divided by the anteriorly diameter of the lateral femoral condyle is HAPR. The HAPR was measured by digital radiograph imaging systems (DR) to quantify femoral sphericity. Cutoff values were defined; and diagnostic performance of the risk factors was assessed. Meanwhile, we measured the posterior tibial slope (PTS) on radiograph and compared the two methods to evaluate the significance of HAPR in predicting ACL rupture. Results: A total of sixty-four patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis (32 with primary ACL rupture, 32 controls). The HAPR was smaller in the knees with primary ACL rupture (0.31 ± 0.02) than that of the control group (0.33 ± 0.02) (p < 0.01). The PTS was bigger in the knees with primary ACL rupture (8.18 ± 2.77) than that of the control group (6.61 ± 2.85) (p = 0.036). The AUC of HAPR was bigger (0.825; 95% CI, 0.72-0.93) than that of PTS (0.675; 95%CI, 0.85-0.81). The calculated cutoff of HAPR of 0.32 (Youden index, 0.56) was associated with an increased risk for ACL rupture, with sensitivity of 75% and specificity of 81% to predict an ACL rupture. Conclusions: This study showed that a decreased HAPR is associated with an ACL rupture, and the decrease of HAPR was more significant in predicting ACL ruptures than the PTS. This helps clinicians identify susceptible individuals who may benefit from targeted ACL rupture prevention counseling and intervention.

The authors declared that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this contribution. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.

No abstract

Background Studies have shown that medial subluxation of the tibia occurs after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. However, it is unclear whether anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) can correct tibial coronal subluxation. Purpose To determine whether the tibia is medially subluxated after ACL rupture, and whether ACLR can correct medial subluxation of the tibia. Study design Case series; Level of evidence, 4, Retrospective clinical study. Methods The distance of tibial coronal subluxation before and after ACLR surgery was measured in 48 patients with ACL rupture and meniscus injury. Tibiofemoral subluxation was defined as the perpendicular distance between the long axis of the tibia and a second parallel line originating at the most proximal aspect of the femoral intercondylar notch. To determine the long axis of the tibia, two circles separated by 5 cm were centered on the proximal tibia. The proximal circle is 5 cm from the tibial plateau, and the distal circle is 5 cm from the proximal circle. The line passing through the center of the two circles was considered the long axis of the proximal tibia. Care was taken to ensure that each patient lied on the back with their patellae facing upward, to minimize rotational variation among the radiographs. At the same time, 30 patients with simple meniscus injury who underwent arthroscopy during the same period were selected to determine the degree of tibiofemoral coronal subluxation as the baseline value. The changes before and after operation were compared, as well as the differences with the baseline data. Result The average follow-up period was 21.2 ± 5.8 months. The average distance of tibial coronal subluxation before ACLR was 5.5 ± 2.1 mm, which was significantly different from that of baseline group (7.3 ± 2.1 mm) (P < 0.001). The tibial subluxation after ACLR was 7.7 ± 2.6 mm, which was significantly different from that before operation (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the distance between postoperative tibial subluxation and baseline group (P = 0.472). Conclusion The tibia was coronally medially subluxated after ACL rupture. ACLR can correct the medial subluxation of tibia. This finding is helpful in the diagnosis of ACL rupture, and can be used to assess the imaging status of the tibiofemoral joint on the coronal plane during or after ACLR.