Sigma‐1 receptor (S1R) regulates reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation via nuclear factor erythroid 2‐related factor 2 (NRF2), which plays a vital role in ferroptosis. Sorafenib is a strong inducer of ferroptosis but not of apoptosis. However, the mechanism of sorafenib‐induced ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. In this study, we found for the first time that sorafenib induced most of S1Rs away from nucleus compared to control groups in Huh‐7 cells, and ferrostatin‐1 completely blocked the translocation. S1R protein expression, but not mRNA expression, in HCC cells was significantly up‐regulated by sorafenib. Knockdown of NRF2, but not of p53 or hypoxia‐inducible factor 1‐alpha (HIF1α), markedly induced S1R mRNA expression in HCC cells. Inhibition of S1R (by RNAi or antagonists) increased sorafenib‐induced HCC cell death in vitro and in vivo. Knockdown of S1R blocked the expression of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4), one of the core targets of ferroptosis, in vitro and in vivo. Iron metabolism and lipid peroxidation increased in the S1R knockdown groups treated with sorafenib compared to the control counterpart. Ferritin heavy chain 1 (FTH1) and transferrin receotor protein 1 (TFR1), both of which are critical for iron metabolism, were markedly up‐regulated in HCC cells treated with erastin and sorafenib, whereas knockdown of S1R inhibited these increases. In conclusion, we demonstrate that S1R protects HCC cells against sorafenib and subsequent ferroptosis. A better understanding of the role of S1R in ferroptosis may provide novel insight into this biological process.
Primary liver cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer‐related deaths. Ferroptosis, a recognized form of regulated cell death, recently gains attention. MicroRNA‐214‐3p (miR‐214) plays a regulatory role in hepatocarcinogenesis. However, the role of miR‐214 in cellular ferroptosis is unclear. This study aimed at elucidating whether miR‐214 could regulate ferroptosis of liver cancer. In vitro, HepG2 and Hep3B cancer cells were treated with erastin, a ferroptosis inducer, and then erastin was demonstrated to suppress the cell viability. Moreover, pre‐miR‐214 overexpression caused that HepG2 and Hep3B cells were more susceptible to erastin, whereas anti‐miR‐214 sponge showed the opposite effect. Additionally, pre‐miR‐214 overexpression increased the malondialdehyde and reactive oxygen species levels, upregulated Fe2+ concentration, and decreased glutathione levels in cancer cells exposed to erastin. Further, erastin enhanced the activation of transcription factor 4 (ATF4) in HepG2 and Hep3B cells, and pre‐miR‐214 overexpression inhibited ATF4 expression. The luciferase reporter data validated ATF4 as a direct target of miR‐214. Cancer cells transfected with ATF4 overexpression plasmid rendered lower susceptible to miR‐214‐induced ferroptotic death. In vivo, erastin significantly reduced the size and weight of xenografted tumors, and miR‐214 elevated the ferroptosis‐promoting effects of erastin and decreased ATF4 expression. In summary, our study demonstrates that the ferroptosis‐promoting effects of miR‐214 in hepatoma cells are attributed at least to its inhibitory effects on ATF4, which may provide a new target for therapy of hepatoma regarding ferroptosis.
Liver X receptors (LXRs) are nuclear receptors that play a central role in cholesterol metabolism. When activated, LXRs induce a series of genes that are involved in cholesterol efflux, absorption, transport and excretion. In recent studies, LXRs have also been shown to play an important role in inflammatory signaling. LXR agonists show promise as potential therapeutics, given their anti-atherogenic and anti-inflammatory properties. The function of LXRs in cholesterol efflux and inflammatory signaling make them attractive as therapies for cardiovascular and inflammatory diseases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.