Background In 2019, Chinese government launched a nationwide volume-based drug procurement aiming at reducing drug prices and saving drug costs through economies of scale, which aroused widespread attention. The first round of the policy pilot was implemented in 4 municipalities and 7 sub-provincial cities, referred to as “4 + 7” policy. In the “4 + 7” policy, 7 antihypertensive drugs were included. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of “4 + 7” policy on the use of policy-related antihypertensive drugs. Method This study applied single-group Interrupted Time Series (ITS) design. We used drug purchasing data from the Centralized Drug Procurement Survey in Shenzhen 2019, covering 24 months from January 2018 to December 2019. Antihypertensive drugs related to “4 + 7” policy were selected as study samples, including 7 drugs in the “4 + 7” List and 17 alternative drugs. Alternative drugs refer to antihypertensive drugs that have an alternative relationship with “4 + 7” List drugs in clinical use and have not yet been covered by the policy. “4 + 7” List drugs were then divided into bid-winning and bid-non-winning products according to the bidding results. Purchase volume, expenditures, and daily costs were selected as outcome variables, and were measured using Defined Daily Doses (DDDs), Chinese Yuan (CNY), and Defined Daily Drug cost (DDDc). Results After “4 + 7” policy intervention, the procurement volume of bid-winning antihypertensive drugs significantly increased (3.12 million DDD, 95 % CI = 2.14 to 4.10, p < 0.001), while the volume of non-winning drugs decreased (-2.33 million DDD, 95 % CI= -2.83 to -1.82, p < 0.01). The use proportion of bid-winning antihypertensive drugs increased from 12.31 to 87.74 % after policy intervention. The overall costs of the seven “4 + 7” List antihypertensive drugs significantly declined (-5.96 million CNY, 95 % CI= -7.87 to -4.04, p < 0.001) after policy intervention, with an absolute reduction of 36.37 million CNY compared with the pre-“4 + 7” period. The DDDc of bid-winning antihypertensive drugs significantly decreased (-1.30 CNY, 95 % CI= -1.43 to -1.18, p < 0.001), while the DDDc of non-winning (0.28 CNY, 95 % CI = 0.11 to 0.46, p < 0.01) and alternative (0.14 CNY, 95 % CI = 0.03 to 0.25, p < 0.05) antihypertensive drugs increased markedly. Conclusions The implementation of “4 + 7” policy promoted the drug use hypertensive patients gradually concentrated on the quality-guaranteed bid-winning drugs, which might be conducive to improve the overall quality level of drug use of Chinese hypertensive patients. Besides, a preliminary positive policy effect of price cut and cost-saving was observed in the antihypertensive drug category. In the future, price monitoring and drug use management regarding policy-related drugs should also be strengthened.
Background: On January 2019, Chinese government implemented the first round of the National Centralized Drug Procurement (NCDP) pilot of 25 drugs in 4 municipalities and 7 sub-provincial cities in mainland China, referred to as “4+7” policy. In the “4+7” policy, 7 antihypertensive drugs were included. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of “4+7” policy on the use of policy-related antihypertensive drugs. Method: This study applied single-group Interrupted Time Series (ITS) design. We used drug purchasing data from the Centralized Drug Procurement Survey in Shenzhen 2019, covering 24 months from January 2018 to December 2019. Antihypertensive drugs related to “4+7” policy were selected as study samples, including 7 antihypertensive drugs in the “4+7” List and 17 antihypertensive drugs that have an alternative relationship with the “4+7” List drugs in clinical use. Purchase volume, expenditures, and daily costs were selected as outcome variables, and were measured using Defined Daily Doses (DDDs), Chinese Yuan (CNY), and Defined Daily Drug cost (DDDc), respectively. Segmented linear regression analysis was employed to examine the change of outcome variables before and after the policy intervention. Results: As of December 31, 2019, the completion rate of the agreed purchase volume of the 7 bid-winning antihypertensive drugs reached 173.42% in Shenzhen. After “4+7” policy, the DDDc of bid-winning antihypertensive drugs significantly decreased by 63.79% (-1.30 CNY, 95% CI= -1.43 to -1.18, p<0.001), while the DDDc of non-winning (0.28 CNY, 95% CI= 0.11 to 0.46, p<0.01) and alternative (0.14 CNY, 95% CI= 0.03 to 0.25, p<0.05) antihypertensive drugs increased markedly. The volume of bid-winning antihypertensive drugs significantly increased by 1311.76% (3.12 million DDD, 95% CI= 2.14 to 4.10, p<0.001). The overall costs of the seven “4+7” List antihypertensive drugs significantly declined by 101.34% (-5.96 million CNY, 95% CI= -7.87 to -4.04, p<0.001) after policy intervention, with an absolute reduction of 36.37 million CNY compared with the pre-“4+7” period. Conclusion: An overall satisfying implementation effect was observed in Shenzhen. A preliminary positive policy effect of price cut and cost-saving was observed in the antihypertensive drug category. However, the DDDc of non-winning and alternative drugs increased after policy intervention, suggesting that the price monitoring and drug use management regarding NCDP policy-related drugs should be strengthened. Keywords: National Centralized Drug Procurement (NCDP); "4+7"; volume-based procurement; antihypertensive drugs; China
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.