Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via distal transradial artery access (d-TRA). Methods For this single-centre prospective cohort study, a total of 1066 patients who underwent CAG or PCI procedures from September 2019 to November 2020 were included. Patients were divided into two groups: the d-TRA group (346) and the conventional transradial artery access (c-TRA) group (720) based on access site. A total of 342 pairs of patients were successfully matched using propensity score matching (PSM) for subsequent analysis. Results No significant differences in puncture success rate, procedural method, procedural time, sheath size, contrast dosage or fluoroscopy time were noted between the two groups. The puncture time in the d-TRA group was longer than that in the c-TRA group (P < 0.01), and the procedure success rate was lower than that in the c-TRA group (90.94% vs. 96.49%, P = 0.01). The haemostasis time in the d-TRA group was shorter than that in the c-TRA group (P < 0.01), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) was lower than that in the c-TRA group (P < 0.01). In addition, the prevalence of bleeding and haematoma in the d-TRA group was lower than that in the c-TRA group (1.75% vs. 7.31%, P < 0.01; 0.58% vs. 3.22%, P = 0.01, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of numbness was noted between the two groups. No other complications were found in two groups. Conclusion d-TRA is as safe and effective as c-TRA for CAG and PCI. It has the advantages of improved comfort and fewer complications. Trail registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900026519.

The distal radial artery (DRA) approach has emerged as a new approach in cardiovascular intervention. In recent years, ultrasound has been widely used in cardiovascular intervention via the DRA approach. This article systematically discusses the progress of ultrasound in the preoperative vascular assessment, intraoperative guided puncture and postoperative observation of complications via the DRA approach.

BackgroundEpididymal leiomyosarcoma is an extremely rare tumor. In this study, we describe the sonographic features of this uncommon tumor.MethodsA case of epididymal leiomyosarcoma diagnosed at our institute was retrospectively analyzed. Ultrasonic images, noted clinical manifestations, treatment procedures, and pathology results were collected for this patient. The same information was collected from a systematic literature search on epididymal leiomyosarcoma, including the PUBMED, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases.ResultsThe literature search resulted in 12 articles; we were able to extract data from 13 cases of epididymal leiomyosarcomatosis. The median patient age was 66 (35–78) years, and the average tumor diameter was 2–7 cm. All patients had unilateral epididymal involvement. The lesions were all solid, irregular-shaped in almost half of the cases, featured clear borders in six cases, and had unclear borders in four cases. The internal echogenicity was heterogeneous in the majority of lesions: six cases were hypoechoic (7/11) and three cases moderately echoic (3/10). Information on blood flow within the mass was provided in four cases, but all were noted with significant vascularity. Surrounding tissue invasion was discussed in 11 cases, with 4 featuring peripheral invasion or metastasis.ConclusionEpididymal Leiomyosarcoma demonstrates sonographic characteristics common to many malignant tumors, such as increased density, irregular shape, heterogeneous internal echogenicity, and hypervascular. Ultrasonography is helpful to differentiate benign epididymal lesions, and can provide some reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. However, compared with other malignant tumors of the epididymis, it has no characteristic sonographic features,and pathological confirmation is required.