Aim To assess the population attributable fractions (PAFs) for modifiable risk factors for microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in China. Materials and Methods Data collected from the China National HbA1c Surveillance System from 2009 to 2013 were used. The PAFs of four predefined risk factors, including an HbA1c of 7% or higher, blood pressure (BP) of 130/80 mmHg or higher, low‐density lipoprotein‐cholesterol (LDL‐C) of 1.8 mmol/L or higher and body mass index (BMI) of 24 kg/m2 or higher, were calculated for diabetic microvascular complications, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN). PAFs were further adjusted for age, sex and duration of diabetes. Results In total, there were 998 379 participants with T2D from nationwide mainland China included in this analysis. As for DR, an HbA1c of 7% or higher, BP of 130/80 mmHg or higher, LDL‐C of 1.8 mmol/L or higher and BMI of 24 kg/m2 or higher conferred PAFs of 16.2%, 15.2%, 5.8% and 2.8%, respectively. In the case of DKD, BP of 130/80 mmHg or higher provided a PAF of 25.2%, followed by an HbA1c of 7% or higher (13.9%), BMI of 24 kg/m2 or higher (8.0%) and LDL‐C of 1.8 mmol/L or higher (5.6%). As for DSPN, an HbA1c of 7% or higher, BP of 130/80 mmHg or higher, LDL‐C of 1.8 mmol/L or higher and BMI of 24 kg/m2 or higher contributed to PAFs of 14.2%, 11.7%, 5.9% and 5.8%, respectively. PAFs for diabetic microvascular complications were mildly to moderately reduced after adjusting for participants' age, sex and duration of diabetes. Conclusions Suboptimal glycaemic and BP control were the main contributors to diabetic microvascular complications, while the PAFs of unmet LDL‐C and BMI control targets were quite limited for diabetic microvascular complications. In addition to glycaemic control, BP control should be especially prioritized in the management of diabetic microvascular complications to further reduce the disease burden.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

AimsGlucokinase activators (GKAs) promote the activity of glucokinase (GK) and is under development for the treatment of diabetes. The efficacy and safety of GKAs require evaluation.MethodsThis meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration of at least 12 weeks conducted in patients with diabetes. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was the difference of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change from baseline to study end between GKA groups and placebo groups. Risk of hypoglycemia and laboratory indicators were also evaluated. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the continuous outcomes, and odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI were calculated for the risk of hypoglycemia.ResultsData from 13 RCTs with 2,748 participants treated with GKAs and 2,681 control participants were analyzed. In type 2 diabetes, the level of HbA1c decreased greater in patients with GKA treatment compared with placebo (WMD = -0.339%, 95% CI -0.524 to -0.154%, P < 0.001). The OR comparing GKA versus placebo was 1.448 for risk of hypoglycemia (95% CI 0.808 to 2.596, P = 0.214). The WMD comparing GKA versus placebo was 0.322 mmol/L for triglyceride (TG) levels (95% CI 0.136 to 0.508 mmol/L, P = 0.001). When stratified by drug type, selectivity, and study duration, a significant difference was found between groups. In type 1 diabetes, the result of HbA1c change and lipid indicators showed no significant difference between the TPP399 group and the placebo group.ConclusionsIn patients with type 2 diabetes, GKA treatment was associated with a better glycemic control but a significant elevation in TG concentration in general. The efficacy and safety varied with drug type and selectivity.Systematic review registrationInternational Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, identifier CRD42022378342.