BackgroundShoulder surgery is often performed in the beach-chair position, a position associated with arterial hypotension and subsequent risk of cerebral ischaemia. It can be performed under general anaesthesia or with an interscalene brachial plexus block, each of which has specific advantages but also specific negative effects on blood pressure control. It would be worthwhile to combine the advantages of the two, but the effects of the combination on the circulation are not well investigated. We studied blood pressure, heart rate, and incidence of adverse circulatory events in patients undergoing shoulder surgery in general anaesthesia with or without an interscalene block.MethodsProspective, randomised, blinded study in outpatients (age 18 to 80 years) undergoing shoulder arthroscopy. General anaesthesia was with propofol/opioid, interscalene block with 40 ml 1% mepivacaine. Hypotension requiring treatment was defined as a mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg or a systolic pressure <80% of baseline; relevant bradycardia was a heart rate <50 bpm with a decrease in blood pressure.ResultsForty-two patients had general anaesthesia alone, 41 had general anaesthesia plus interscalene block. The average systolic blood pressure under anaesthesia in the beach-chair position was 114 ± 7.3 vs. 116 ± 8.3 mmHg (p = 0.09; all comparisons General vs. General-Regional). The incidence of a mean arterial pressure under 60 mmHg or a decrease in systolic pressure of more than 20% from baseline was 64% vs. 76% (p = 0.45). The number of patients with a heart rate lower than 50 and a concomitant blood pressure decrease was 8 vs. 5 (p = 0.30).ConclusionOne can safely combine interscalene block with general anaesthesia for surgery in the beach-chair position in ASA I and II patients.Clinical trial numberDRKS00005295.

Abstract

Selective unilateral spinal anaesthesia is a useful approach for ambulatory lower limb surgery because it allows more rapid home discharge compared to bilateral block. Infrequent use is due to the fact that obtaining selective unilateral block can be difficult, requiring attention to technique. We present a method with a high success rate that uses real-time monitoring of the sympathetic activity of the legs. In this prospective study, 56 patients scheduled for ambulatory knee arthroscopy had spinal anaesthesia in the lateral recumbent position, with hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% injected at 0.33 ml/min up to a maximum dose of 5 mg. Sympathetic tone of the legs was monitored by plantar electrical dermal resistance. The clinical effect was assessed by loss of sensation and muscle strength. The haemodynamic course and adverse events were monitored. The motor block was strictly unilateral in 55 patients (98%) and the sensory block was strictly unilateral in 53 patients (94%). The median decrease in systolic blood pressure was 6 mmHg. The time from subarachnoid puncture to arrival in the recovery room was 73 ± 23 minutes; the duration of stay in the recovery room was 70 ± 30 minutes. Three patients with a well-established block of adequate extent required conversion to general anaesthesia because of tourniquet pain. Urinary retention only occurred in the sole patient with bilateral block. This method of performing selective unilateral spinal anaesthesia using real-time monitoring of sympathetic tone of the legs has a high success rate and is associated with rapid eligibility for home discharge.

No abstract