The innate immune system detects infection by employing germline-encoded receptors specific for conserved microbial molecules. Recognition of microbial ligands leads to the production of cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFN), that are essential for successful pathogen elimination. Cytosolic detection of pathogen-derived DNA is one major mechanism of IFN induction1,2, and requires signaling via Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1), and its downstream transcription factor, Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 (IRF3). In addition, a transmembrane protein called STING (STimulator of INterferon Genes; also called MITA, ERIS, MPYS, TMEM173) functions as an essential signaling adaptor linking cytosolic detection of DNA to the TBK1/IRF3 signaling axis3–7. Recently, unique nucleic acids called cyclic dinucleotides, which function as conserved signaling molecules in bacteria8, were also shown to induce a STING-dependent type I interferon response9–12. However, a mammalian sensor of cyclic dinucleotides has not been identified. Here we report evidence that STING itself is an innate immune sensor of cyclic dinucleotides. We demonstrate that STING binds directly to radiolabelled cyclic diguanylate monophosphate (c-di-GMP) and that this binding is competed by unlabelled cyclic dinucleotides but not by other nucleotides or nucleic acids. Furthermore, we identify mutations in STING that selectively affect the response to cyclic dinucleotides without affecting the response to DNA. Thus, STING appears to function as a direct sensor of cyclic dinucleotides, in addition to its established role as a signaling adaptor in the interferon response to cytosolic DNA. Cyclic dinucleotides have shown promise as novel vaccine adjuvants and immunotherapeutics9,13. Our results provide insight into the mechanism by which cyclic dinucleotides are sensed by the innate immune system.

Multicellular eukaryotes coevolve with microbial pathogens, which exert strong selective pressure on the immune systems of their hosts. Plants and animals use intracellular proteins of the nucleotide-binding domain, leucine-rich repeat (NLR) superfamily to detect many types of microbial pathogens. The NLR domain architecture likely evolved independently and convergently in each kingdom, and the molecular mechanisms of pathogen detection by plant and animal NLRs have long been considered to be distinct. However, microbial recognition mechanisms overlap, and it is now possible to discern important key trans-kingdom principles of NLR-dependent immune function. Here, we attempt to articulate these principles. We propose that the NLR architecture has evolved for pathogen-sensing in diverse organisms because of its utility as a tightly folded "hair trigger" device into which a virtually limitless number of microbial detection platforms can be integrated. Recent findings suggest means to rationally design novel recognition capabilities to counter disease.

Inflammasomes are a family of cytosolic multiprotein complexes that initiate innate immune responses to pathogenic microbes by activating the CASPASE1 (CASP1) protease1,2. Although genetic data support a critical role for inflammasomes in immune defense and inflammatory diseases3, the molecular basis by which individual inflammasomes respond to specific stimuli remains poorly understood. The inflammasome that contains the NLRC4 (NLR family, CARD domain containing C4) protein was previously shown to be activated in response to two distinct bacterial proteins, flagellin4,5 and PrgJ6, a conserved component of pathogen-associated type III secretion systems. However, direct binding between NLRC4 and flagellin or PrgJ has never been demonstrated. A homolog of NLRC4, NAIP5 (NLR family, Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein 5), has been implicated in activation of NLRC47–11, but is widely assumed to play only an auxiliary role1,2, since NAIP5 is often dispensable for NLRC4 activation7,8. However, Naip5 is a member of a small multigene family12, raising the possibility of redundancy and functional specialization among Naip genes. Indeed, we show here that different NAIP paralogs dictate the specificity of the NLRC4 inflammasome for distinct bacterial ligands. In particular, we found that activation of endogenous NLRC4 by bacterial PrgJ requires NAIP2, a previously uncharacterized member of the NAIP gene family, whereas NAIP5 and NAIP6 activate NLRC4 specifically in response to bacterial flagellin. We dissected the biochemical mechanism underlying the requirement for NAIP proteins by use of a reconstituted NLRC4 inflammasome system. We found that NAIP proteins control ligand-dependent oligomerization of NLRC4 and that NAIP2/NLRC4 physically associates with PrgJ but not flagellin, whereas NAIP5/NLRC4 associates with flagellin but not PrgJ. Taken together, our results identify NAIPs as immune sensor proteins and provide biochemical evidence for a simple receptor-ligand model for activation of the NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasomes.

The production of virulence factors including cholera toxin and the toxin-coregulated pilus in the human pathogen Vibrio cholerae is strongly influenced by environmental conditions. The well-characterized ToxR signal transduction cascade is responsible for sensing and integrating the environmental information and controlling the virulence regulon. We show here that, in addition to the known components of the ToxR signaling circuit, quorum-sensing regulators are involved in regulation of V. cholerae virulence. We focused on the regulators LuxO and HapR because homologues of these two proteins control quorum sensing in the closely related luminous marine bacterium Vibrio harveyi. Using an infant mouse model, we found that a luxO mutant is severely defective in colonization of the small intestine. Gene arrays were used to profile transcription in the V. cholerae wild type and the luxO mutant. These studies revealed that the ToxR regulon is repressed in the luxO mutant, and that this effect is mediated by another negative regulator, HapR. We show that LuxO represses hapR expression early in log-phase growth, and constitutive expression of hapR blocks ToxR-regulon expression. Additionally, LuxO and HapR regulate a variety of other cellular processes including motility, protease production, and biofilm formation. Together these data suggest a role for quorum sensing in modulating expression of blocks of virulence genes in a reciprocal fashion in vivo. The Gram-negative bacterium Vibrio cholerae usually inhabits natural aquatic environments, but it is best known as the causative agent of cholera, a severe diarrheal disease (1). Two factors are critical to V. cholerae virulence-cholera enterotoxin (CT) and an intestinal colonization factor known as the toxincoregulated pilus (TCP). Poorly characterized environmental cues influence the expression of CT and TCP in vivo (2). Two sensory proteins, ToxR and TcpP, likely play a role in detection of the environmental signals, and then initiate a signal transduction cascade that promotes the expression of ToxT, which in turn, directly activates the transcription of genes involved in TCP and CT expression (3).Recent work has established that many species of bacteria monitor their cell-population densities through the exchange of chemical signaling molecules (called autoinducers) that accumulate extracellularly and trigger alterations in behavior at high population densities. This phenomenon is referred to as quorum sensing (4, 5). Quorum sensing controls processes that include bioluminescence, virulence, biofilm formation, and sporulation in various bacterial species. In general, quorum sensing regulates processes that are effective only when a population of bacteria acts in a coordinated manner, but not when the bacteria act as individuals. Gram-negative bacteria typically use acylhomoserine lactones as autoinducers (5, 6), whereas Grampositive bacteria usually use modified oligopeptides as the communication signals (5-7). A link between quorum sensing and virulence has been es...