ObjectiveCranial dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs) with cortical venous drainage (CVD) (Borden type 2 and 3) are reported to carry a 15% annual risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) or non-hemorrhagic neurological deficit (NHND). The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical course of type 2 and 3 dAVFs that present with ICH or NHND versus those that do not.Methods28 patients with type 2 or 3 dAVFs were retrospectively evaluated. CVD was classified as asymptomatic (aCVD) if patients presented incidentally or with pulsatile tinnitus or orbital phenomena. CVD was classified as symptomatic (sCVD) if patients presented with ICH or NHND. Occurrence of new ICH or new or worsening NHND between diagnosis and disconnection of CVD or last follow-up (if not disconnected) was noted. Overall frequency of events was compared using Fisher's exact test. Cumulative event free survival was compared using Kaplan–Meier analysis with log rank testing.ResultsOf 17 patients with aCVD, one (5.9%) developed ICH and none experienced NHND or death during the mean 4.1 years of follow-up. Of 11 patients with sCVD, two (18.2%) developed ICH and three (27.3%) suffered new or worsened NHND over the mean 2.4 years of follow-up. One of these patients subsequently died. Overall frequency of ICH or NHND was significantly lower in patients with aCVD versus sCVD (p=0.022). Respective annual event rates were 1.4% versus 19.0%. aCVD patients had significantly higher cumulative event free survival (p=0.0016).ConclusionCranial dAVFs with aCVD may have a less aggressive clinical course than those with sCVD.
LMWH prophylaxis seems to carry a very low hemorrhage risk when started 24 to 36 hours after spine surgery. Larger, prospective studies are needed to assess the safety of early delayed LMWH administration more definitively. Even with aggressive prophylaxis, patients undergoing fusion or multilevel laminectomy for degenerative disease are at significant risk for VTE.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.