Five murine hybridoma lines that produce monoclonal antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus membrane antigen (MA) were established. Immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that three of the antibodies precipitated both the 236,000 (236K) MA and the 212K MA. The other two antibodies precipitated the 86K MA. Antibodies against the 236K-212K MA and the 86K MA mediated complement-dependent cytolysis of Epstein-Barr-virus-infected cells. The antibodies against the 86K MA neutralized both the B95-8 and P3HR-1 viruses.
Two lymphoblastoid cell lines were established from baboons with lymphoid disease. Cells of these lines were positive for complement and Fc receptors but lacked sheep cell receptors, thereby indicating B-cell origin. The cells contained antigens which cross-reacted with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), viral capsid antigen (VCA), early antigen (EA) and membrane antigen (MA). Both lines released virus with in vitro transforming activity for lymphocytes of several primate species including humans. Cells of the original lines and transformed cells showed no staining for EB nuclear antigen (EBNA). The virus was neutralized by anti-MA positive baboon and human sera. Baboon virus and EBV had different but overlapping in vitro host-cell ranges.
Intraperitoneal injection of human rIL-1 in a dose of 0.5 microgram daily for 5 d, or 1 microgram daily for 3 d, was capable of causing complete regression of immunogenic SA1 sarcoma growing subcutaneously in syngeneic or semisyngeneic mice. Higher doses of IL-1 were not more therapeutic against the SA1 sarcoma, but needed to be given to cause complete regression of the immunogenic L5178Y lymphoma. On the other hand, the P815 mastocytoma was much less responsive to IL-1 therapy, in that it failed to undergo complete regression in response to doses of IL-1 capable of causing regression of the L5178Y lymphoma. IL-1 caused regression of the SA1 sarcoma when given on days 6-8 of tumor growth, but not when given on days 1-3. This refractoriness of a small tumor to IL-1 therapy suggests that the antitumor action of IL-1 is based on an underlying host-immune response that is not generated until after day 3 of tumor growth. Direct evidence for the participation of host immunity in IL-1-induced tumor regression was supplied by results showing that IL-1 was not therapeutic against the SA1 sarcoma growing in T cell-deficient (TXB) mice, unless these mice were first infused with Ly-2+ and L3T4+ T cells from donor mice bearing an established SA1 sarcoma. In contrast, normal T cells, or T cells from donor mice bearing a YAC-1 lymphoma, failed to provide TXB recipients with the ability to cause regression of their SA-1 sarcoma in response to IL-1 treatment. The results are in keeping with the interpretation that exogenous IL-1, by augmenting the production of tumor-sensitized T cells, converts a subtherapeutic level of host immunity to a therapeutic level. The results suggest, in addition, that IL-1 only stimulates the replication of T cells that are already engaged in the antitumor immune response.
A B S T R A C T Two human monocyte subsets from the peripheral blood of healthy donors have been isolated in >90% purity by countercurrent centrifugal elutration and human serum albumin gradients and their functional capabilities have been assessed.We have demonstrated that one subset ("regular" monocytes, RM) showed intense cytoplasmic peroxidase staining and contained substantial peroxidase activity. In contrast, another subset ("intermediate" monocytes, IM) stained poorly for peroxidase and had low peroxidase activity. By electron microscopic analysis combined with peroxidase localization, it was found that IM had fewer peroxidase-positive granules per cell than did RM. IM coelutriated with some lymphocytes and by cell sizing analysis were shown to be slightly smaller than RM.Functional and cytochemical analysis of these subsets indicated that IM had less activity than RM in assays such as accessory cell function for mitogen-induced T lymphocyte proliferation and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, and that fewer IM expressed OKM1 antigen and pokeweed mitogen (PWM) receptors on their membranes than did RM. The subset of IM not bearing either the PWM receptor or the OKM1 antigen had very low peroxidase activity. IM also were found to have a greater sensitivity to polyriboinosinic and polyribocytidilic acid (100 ug/ml)-induced secretion of interferon. There was no significant difference in the phagocytic capability, the percentage Received for publication 21 March 1983 and in revised form 23 May 1983. of Fc receptor-positive cells, 5'-nucleotidase activity, DR antigen expression, or the responsiveness to migration inhibitory factor of IM as compared with RM. Furthermore, it was found that the ratio of IM to RM increased after prolonged cytapheresis, which suggests that IM are more mobilizable than RM from the extravascular reservoirs of human monocytes.
A 65,000-dalton (65K) antigen found in Raji cells by fluoroimmunoelectrophoresis and radioimmunoelectrophoresis has been identified as an Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen (EBNA). This identification is based on the following evidence. The 65K antigen is detected in Raji cells but not in three Epstein-Barr virus (-) human B cell lines. It is not detected with EBNA (-) sera. The 65K antigen is found predominantly in the nucleus and co-elutes with EBNA during partial purification by DNA-Sepharose and Blue Dextran-Sepharose chromatography. Finally, the partially purified 65K antigen is an effective absorbant of EBNA antibody as measured in an anticomplement immunofluorescence assay. Antigens with molecular weights of 72, 70, and 73K have been detected in B95-8, P3HR-1, and Namalwa cells, respectively. These antigens are the likely homologues of the 65K Raji EBNA. In addition, an Epstein-Barr virus-associated, 81K DNA-binding antigen has been detected in both B95-8 and Raji cells.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.