1. We have studied the sensations evoked by threshold microstimulation (TMS) in the area of the human principal sensory nucleus of the thalamus [ventralis caudalis (Vc)] in patients (n = 11) undergoing stereotactic surgery for the treatment of movement disorders and pain. Preoperatively, patients were trained to describe somatic sensory stimuli using a standard list of descriptors. This same list was used to describe sensations evoked intraoperatively by thalamic microstimulation. Stimulation sites (n = 216) were defined by location within the area where the majority of cells had a reproducible response to innocuous cutaneous stimulation (core region) or in the cellular area posterior and inferior to the core region (posteroinferior region). 2. TMS-evoked sensations were categorized as paresthetic if the descriptors "tingle," "vibration," or "electric current" were chosen by the patient to describe the sensation and as thermal/pain if the descriptors "cool," "warm," "warm and cool," or "pain" were chosen. Thermal/pain sensations were evoked by stimulation in 82% (9/11) of patients and at 19% of sites studied. These results suggest that thalamic microstimulation can evoke thermal/pain sensations reproducibly across patients. 3. Thermal/pain sensations were evoked more frequently by stimulation at sites in the posteroinferior region (30%) than by stimulation at sites in the core region (5%). Nonpainful thermal sensations composed the majority of thermal/pain sensations evoked by stimulation in both the core (80%) and posteroinferior regions (86%). Sites where stimulation evoked pain and nonpainful cool sensations were found anterior to the area where nonpainful warm sensations were evoked. Thermal/pain sensations were evoked at sites located medially near the border between the core and posteroinferior regions. 4. Radiologic techniques were used to determine the presumed nuclear location of stimulation sites. Thermal/pain sensations were evoked less frequently by stimulation in the part of Vc included in the core region than by stimulation in any of the following: the part of Vc included in the posteroinferior region, ventralis caudalis portae nucleus, ventralis caudalis parvocellularis nucleus, or the white matter underlying the ventral nuclear group. 5. The location of the sensation evoked by stimulation [projected field (PF)] varied widely in size. PFs were categorized as large if they involved more than one part of the body (e.g., face and arm) or if they crossed at least one joint proximal to the metacarpophalangeal joint or to the metatarsophalangeal joint. PFs were more frequently large at sites where thermal/pain sensations were evoked by TMS (33%) than at those where paresthesia were evoked (6%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

1. We explored the region of the principal sensory nucleus of thalamus (Vc) during stereotactic surgical procedures for treatment of patients with pain after spinal cord transection (n = 23). Receptive fields (RFs) of thalamic single neurons and locations of sensations evoked by stimulation (projected field, PF) were determined by standard methods. The cellular thalamic region where sensations were evoked at < 25 microA was termed the "region of Vc." The region of Vc in spinal patients was subdivided into different areas according to RF and PF locations. Areas that were distant from the representation of the anesthetic part of the body were termed "spinal control" areas, whereas those that were adjacent to or included in the representation of the area of absolute sensory loss were termed "border zone/anesthetic" areas. The region of Vc in movement disorder patients were termed the "control" area. 2. Border zone/anesthetic areas of thalamus often exhibited increased representations of the border of the anesthetic part of the body in comparison with the representation of the same parts of the body in control and spinal control areas. 3. In control and spinal control areas the locations of RFs and PFs were usually well matched. However, in border zone/anesthetic areas of the thalamus there was frequently a mismatch between the location of RFs and PFs (RF/PF mismatch). In border zone/anesthetic areas, RFs were often located on the border of the anesthetic part of the body whereas PFs were referred to anesthetic parts of the body. 4. Analysis of first- and higher-order properties of spontaneous neuronal activity revealed that spike trains could be classified into two groups with distinct patterns of activity. The R group (n = 49) was characterized by independence of sequential interspike intervals (ISIs), a Poisson distribution of ISIs, initially inhibitory or flat autocovariance function (acvf), and low level of high-frequency bursting. The O group (n = 26) was characterized by correlation of sequential ISIs, large sustained postspike facilitation on the acvf, and high prevalence of high-frequency bursting--all consistent with a bursting pattern of activity. A third group of spike trains (n = 17) had an initially inhibitory or flat acvf and a unimodal, positively shifted, ISI distribution that did not meet criteria for a Poisson distribution. 5. Spike trains in the R group were much more common in control and control spinal areas, whereas those in the O group were more common in border zone/anesthetic areas.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

No abstract

No abstract