Regardless of the simplicity of the test layout, interpretation of the tensile test results may be inadequate. Typically, a test of the reinforced concrete tie provides measurements of average deformations of the internal reinforcing bar and the concrete surface. The experimental evidence, however, often contradicts with the general assumption of the similarity of mean strains of the reinforcement and concrete. Analysis of the sources influencing the scatter of the experimental results motivated this investigation of the representativeness of the specimens. In this study, the representativeness is understood as a property of a tie to isolate the investigated parameters (e.g., the deformation components) from other uncontrolled effects typical of test with limited sample sizes. This study aims at determining the representative geometry of the test samples that would enable the reduction of the end effect. A consistent procedure is proposed for identifying the cracking parameters of the ties with different testing layouts.
The current study has two objectives: to validate the ability of the Atena finite-element software to estimate the deformations of reinforced concrete (RC) elements strengthened with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets and to assess the effect of FRP-to-concrete bond strength on the results of numerical simulation. It is shown that the bond strength has to be selected according to the overall stiffness of the composite element. The numerical results found are corroborated experimentally by tensile tests of RC elements strengthened with basalt FRP sheets.
Traditional steel reinforcement does not resist corrosion and its resources are limited; therefore, carbon, glass, aramid and basalt fibre reinforced polymer bars were developed. The composite reinforcement has a high tensile strength and resistance to electromagnetic fields. Different kinds of materials and application of various surface coatings are used in the production of the composite bars. This results in different adhesion to concrete and mechanical properties of composite bars. In comparison with steel reinforcement, glass, aramid and basalt fibre reinforced polymer bars have a lower modulus of elasticity. Thus, structural rigidity provided by these bars is smaller in respect to reinforced concrete elements. Current reinforced concrete design codes and recommendations are based on empirical and simplified methods of strain evaluation, which may be inadequate for design of structures with composite bars. In this paper, an adequacy of the empirical models was checked against the experimental data of concrete beams reinforced with composite bars. The moment-curvature data of 52 beams reported in the literature and conducted by the authors were used for assessment of accuracy of design methods. In order to perform the analysis, different methods from design codes (European (LST 2007), American (ACI Committee 318 2011) and Russian (NIIZhB 2006)) and recommendations (Italian (CNR 2007) and American (ACI Committee 440 2006)) have been selected. The results of the investigation will provide engineers with more information on design of concrete beams with fibre reinforced polymer bars. This will encourage an extensive use of these innovative materials in different types of structures. Santrauka Tradicinė plieninė armatūra nėra atspari korozijai, jos iŠtekliai yra riboti, todėl buvo sukurti polimeriniai strypai, armuoti anglies, stiklo, bazalto arba aramido pluoŠtu. Ši kompozitinė armatūra pasižymi dideliu tempiamuoju stipriu ir atsparumu elektromagnetiniam laukui. Kompozitinių strypų gamyboje naudojamos skirtingos medžiagos ir taikomi įvairūs pavirŠiaus dengimo būdai, skiriasi jų mechaninės bei sukibimo su betonu savybės. Lyginant su plienine armatūra, stiklo, aramido ir bazalto kompozitiniai strypų tamprumo modulis yra mažesnis, todėl tokiais strypais armuotų konstrukcijų standumas taip pat yra mažesnis nei gelžbetoninių konstrukcijų. Dabartiniuose gelžbetoninių konstrukcijų projektavimo reglamentuose taikomi empiriniai supaprastinti deformacijų nustatymo metodai gali būti netinkami konstrukcijoms, armuotoms polimerine armatūra, projektuoti. Šiame darbe, naudojant mokslinėse publikacijose surinktų 46 eksperimentinių tyrimų ir autorių atliktų 6 sijų bandymų duomenis, buvo įvertintas kompozitais armuoto betono elementų įlinkių skaičiavimo metodų tikslumas. Analizei atlikti buvo pasirinkti Europos (LST EN 1992-1-1:2005), JAV (ACI 318M-11) ir Rusijos (SP 52-101-2003) armuotojo betono konstrukcijų projektavimo normų bei Italijos (CNR-DT 203/2006) ir JAV (ACI 440.1R-06) projektavimo rekomendacijų metodai. Gauti analizės rezultatai suteiks projektuotojams iŠsamesnę informaciją apie kompozitais armuotų betoninių elementų projektavimą, skatins didins Šių inovatyvių medžiagų naudojimo apimtį įvairiose statybinėse konstrukcijose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.