Introduction: Refugees experience a number of difficulties when settling in the United Kingdom and may be faced with occupational injustice due to their restricted occupational engagement. This study explores the value of an allotment group for refugees of working age, aiming to explore the role of horticulture and the social environment on health, wellbeing and social inclusion. Method: This was an exploratory study using qualitative methodology based on ethnographic principles. Data collection included observation of the group, semi-structured interviews with five participants, with four of these participants also taking part in photo-elicitation interviews. Data analysis involved using a ‘framework’ approach to produce three themes and associated sub-themes. Findings: Analysis identified firstly gardening as a meaningful activity; secondly, the importance of the social environment and, lastly, the value of occupational engagement for refugees. Further theoretical analysis led to the conclusion that these themes linked to the dimensions of occupation: doing, being, belonging and becoming. Conclusion: The findings identify how occupational engagement can have a positive impact on the health and wellbeing of refugees, specifically with the use of social and therapeutic horticulture.

The matching law suggests that behavior is emitted in proportion to the level of reinforcement available. The current study investigated this effect in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and focused on the effects of magnitude of reinforcement (Study 1), and rate of reinforcement (Studies 2 and 3), on matching performance. Studies 1 and 2 employed lower functioning children with ASD, and demonstrated matching in both groups, but that the group with ASD displayed greater levels of stimulus bias. Study 3 employed higher functioning children with ASD, and found little evidence of matching, but higher stimulus bias in the group with ASD. These effects suggest a disruption of stimulus control, but not reward sensitivity, in individuals with ASD.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective: The objective of this review is to identify and characterize the use of the natural environment/outdoor space by occupational therapists working in mental health care. Introduction: Research has shown that the natural environment is beneficial for our health and can be used to help people who are experiencing mental health problems. Occupational therapists are well placed to assess and utilize the environment when treating people with mental health problems; however, the use of the natural environment/outdoor space by occupational therapists working in mental health is unclear. Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will include both primary research and gray literature relating to the use of the natural environment/outdoor space in mental health occupational therapy practice. The review will be limited to studies published in English. There will be no geographical or age restrictions. Methods: Embase (Ovid), MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (ProQuest), AMED (EBSCO), Trip Database, Emcare (Ovid), and OTSeeker will be searched for studies. Unpublished studies and gray literature will be searched using GreyNet and National Grey Literature Collection, alongside professional magazines and websites. Titles and abstracts will be screened by 2 independent reviewers for assessment against the inclusion criteria, followed by a full-text review and data extraction. Any disagreements will be discussed with a third reviewer. Data will be extracted using a data extraction tool developed by the reviewers, and presented in tabular format, accompanied by a narrative summary describing how the results relate to the review objective and question.