Gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, abdominal pain, and bloating are frequent complaints of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). It has been postulated that impaired gastrointestinal function may contribute to the development of motor fluctuations such as delay on and no on in patients with PD. Gastrointestinal impaired function and symptoms may be associated with the disease itself or secondary to levodopa treatment. Thus, we assessed gastric emptying (GE) and gastric motility in PD patients to examine the association between clinical status and gastric function. GE and antral contraction (frequency and amplitude) were evaluated by scintigraphy in 29 patients with mild PD (Hoehn and Yahr [H&Y] stage 1.0-2.0); 22 patients with moderate PD (H&Y stage 2.5-3.0); and 22 healthy volunteers, following the ingestion of a labeled standard meal. Gastric emptying (mean +/- SD of T(1/2)) and antral contraction were not significantly different between patients with mild PD (63.4 +/- 28.8 minutes) and moderate PD (54.7 +/- 25.5 minutes). In the control group, GE was 43.4 +/- 10.8 minutes (range 29.0 - 61.0 minutes). The prevalence of delayed emptying (>61 minutes) was not significantly different in patients with mild disease (48.3%) as compared with patients with moderate disease (36.4%). Antral contraction, both frequency and amplitude, were not significantly different between patients with mild and moderate PD throughout the entire 100 minutes of the study. Untreated patients (n = 28) had mean GE T(1/2) of 59 +/- 30.6 minutes. Patients with smooth response to levodopa showed slower GE (n = 10; 73.6 +/- 25.3 minutes), while treated patients with motor response fluctuations when tested at the on state (n = 13), had much faster GE (49.3 +/- 16.2 minutes). This shortened GE in the on state was similar to the GE of normal volunteers. We conclude that gastric emptying time in patients with PD was delayed compared with control volunteers. It was even slower in patients treated with levodopa. This effect of levodopa treatment was reversed to pseudonormalization (normal GE) at the advanced stages of the disease, when patients developed motor response fluctuation. Other clinical features of PD were not associated with delayed gastric emptying.

Interpretation of positron emission tomographic (PET) scans in the absence of correlative anatomic information can be challenging. PET-computed tomography (CT) fusion imaging is a novel multimodality technology that allows the correlation of findings from two concurrent imaging modalities in a comprehensive examination. CT demonstrates exquisite anatomic detail but does not provide functional information, whereas 2-[fluorine 18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) PET reveals aspects of tumor function and allows metabolic measurements. Subtle findings at FDG PET that might otherwise be disregarded or interpreted as physiologic variants may lead to detection of a malignant process after being correlated with simultaneously acquired CT findings. Alternatively, equivocal CT findings, which could represent malignant tumor, reactive changes, or fibrosis, can be clarified with the help of the additional metabolic information provided by concurrent FDG PET. Accurate interpretation of FDG PET scans requires a thorough knowledge of the normal physiologic distribution of FDG and of normal variants that may reduce the accuracy of PET studies, thereby significantly affecting patient treatment. Although in rare instances PET-CT cannot help resolve the diagnostic dilemma, it is enjoying widespread acceptance in the medical imaging community, usually allowing differentiation of physiologic variants from juxtaposed or mimetic neoplastic lesions and more accurate tumor localization.

In this series hydroxyurea has not shown effectiveness in the treatment of non-resectable slow-growing meningiomas: neither for achieving response, nor for arresting disease progression.

No abstract

Sentinel lymph node biopsy may be more technically challenging for melanoma of the head and neck compared with other locations because of the complex lymphatic drainage patterns. This study demonstrates the value of sentinel node biopsy for head and neck melanoma, and highlights the associated difficulties. Thirty consecutive patients with primary cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck (n=26) or draining to the neck (n=4) underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. This was followed by intraoperative lymphatic mapping using blue dye alone (n=8) or in combination with a hand-held gamma probe (n=22) and sentinel lymphadenectomy. Modified neck dissection was performed in all patients with positive sentinel nodes. The study population had a male predominance (73%). Most lesions were nodular and were not ulcerated. In two patients (6.2%) preoperative lymphoscintigraphy failed to demonstrate the draining nodes, which were retrieved by surgery, and in two patients (6.2%) the sentinel node was not found at surgery despite preoperative visualization. Overall, the sentinel node was identified 93% of the time: in seven out of eight cases (88%) using blue dye alone, and in 21 out of 22 cases (96%) using a combination of blue dye and gamma probe. Four out of 28 basins were deemed positive for metastases. Twenty-three of the 24 patients with negative sentinel nodes were free of disease at a median of 31 months (range 9-91 months). There was one false-negative case salvaged by surgery. The sentinel node technique is technically demanding but advantageous for most patients with head and neck melanoma. Identification rates seem to be better when preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is combined with intraoperative blue dye mapping and a hand-held gamma probe. The relative contribution of each component could not be determined.