Limbic encephalitis is a disease that can occur in childhood or adolescence with many of the hallmarks of the adult disorder, suggesting that both result from similar pathogenic processes. Since most of the cases were non-paraneoplastic, as now also recognised in adults, more systematic and aggressive immunotherapies should be evaluated in order to improve outcomes.
SUMMARYPurpose: The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of status epilepticus (SE) in children and to define predictors for morbidity, mortality, and SE recurrence. Methods: The study included 302 children (age 2 months to less than 18 years; mean age ± SD 4.7 ± 4.2 years) with 489 episodes of SE. Etiology, treatment, and clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features of SE and their impact on the outcome were analyzed. The outcome was classified into three categories: unchanged neurologic status, neurologic consequences, and lethal outcome. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard regression analyses were used to define predictors of mortality, morbidity, and SE recurrence. Key Findings: Neurologic status was unchanged in 235 children (77.8%) and neurologic consequences occurred in 39 patients (12.9%); case-fatality ratio was 9.3% and recurrence rate was 21%. Mortality was related to progressive encephalopathy, preexisting neurologic abnormalities, specific EEG findings, and generalized convulsive type of SE. Neurologic consequences were associated with younger age, progressive encephalopathy, duration of SE >24 h, prior epilepsy, and specific EEG findings. Multivariate analyses showed that etiology of SE and prior neurologic abnormalities were independent predictors of mortality, whereas younger age, etiology, and very long duration of SE were predictors of morbidity. Significance: Outcome of SE in children is favorable in most of the cases, but mortality and morbidity rates are still high. Etiology and prior neurologic abnormalities were the main predictors of mortality, whereas the main predictor of morbidity was underlying etiology.
SUMMARYObjective: Evaluation of efficacy of vigabatrin as the first drug in infants with previously untreated infantile spasms (IS) and reporting the long-term outcome. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 180 infants with infantile spasms treated with vigabatrin as the first drug. Following initial evaluation and a 48-h basal period for counting the spasms, vigabatrin was administered using the same protocol in all. After 14 days all infants were assessed for therapeutic response (primary outcome). Psychomotor development was evaluated by a psychologist and neurologist prior to the initiation of treatment and during the follow-up. Seizure outcomes were followed prospectively, by seizure types and epilepsy syndromes. Long-term (secondary) outcomes included neurologic status, occurrence of late epilepsy, and developmental/cognitive status. Results: Vigabatrin terminated the spasms in 101 patients (56.9%) at a mean period of 5 days. Patients with normal psychomotor development prior to the onset of spasms responded best. After follow-up of 2.4 to 18.9 years (mean 10.64; standard deviation [SD] 4.40), 38.1% of responders, treated with vigabatrin, had severe neurologic dysfunction, 42% had epilepsy, and 42.2% had unfavorable intellectual outcome. The group with symptomatic etiology and abnormal neurologic status at presentation demonstrated a significantly worse prognosis and a more unfavorable outcome than cryptogenic or idiopathic cases (85.1% and 81.6% versus 14.9% and 0%-p = 0.001). Idiopathic patients treated with vigabatrin were all intellectually normal, except the youngest patient who had borderline cognitive function. Significance: The most important prognostic factors were the underlying etiology and preexisting developmental profile. Long-term outcome in the patients treated with vigabatrin was similar to the outcome in patients treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) or corticosteroids, as reported in earlier studies. The long-term prognosis of idiopathic cases treated with vigabatrin was favorable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.