Background Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) stroke is a catastrophic clinical event that results in significant morbidity and mortality. Whether MT is superior in improving outcomes remains largely inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to better understand the efficacy and safety of MT in treating BAO compared to medical management (MM). Methods PubMed and EMBASE were searched to identify RCTs that directly compared the safety and efficacy of MT versus MM for patients with BAO. The primary outcome was modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–3 at 3 months, and secondary outcome variables included National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 hours, mRS 0–2 at 3 months, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Results Four RCTs with 988 patients (432 in the MM arm and 556 in the MT arm), were included. Patients receiving MT had significantly higher rate of mRS 0–2 (OR = 1.994, 95% CI: 1.319–3.012) and mRS 0–3 (OR = 2.259, 95% CI: 1.166–4.374) at 3 months in comparison to patients receiving MM. Mortality was also significantly reduced in the MT group (OR = 0.640, 95% CI: 0.493–0.831). However, increased odds of sICH were found in the MT group compared to the MM group (OR = 8.193, 95% CI: 2.451–27.389). No difference was observed in terms of NIHSS at 24 hours between the two arms. Conclusions Despite the higher risk of sICH, MT was associated with superior functional outcomes and reduced mortality compared to MM in BAO patients. A revision of current guidelines for treatment of acute ischemic stroke from basilar artery occlusion should be considered.

Background Acute strokes involving complete, isolated occlusion of the extracranial cervical internal carotid artery (EC-ICA) with no intracranial clot burden account for a minority of stroke cases that are managed variably. Here we present our two-decade experience and a systematic review of endovascular management of acute isolated EC-ICA strokes in the hyperacute phase (<48 h) and attempt to evaluate clinical effectiveness and safety. Methods Our prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for patients who presented between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2022 with acute cervical ICA stroke confirmed on angiography. Only patients who had an isolated 100% occlusion of the cervical ICA segment and attempted acute stenting with/without angioplasty within the first 48 h of time since last known well were included. Demographics, procedural details, and outcomes were recorded. For the systematic review, a search of PubMed and Embase databases was conducted. Results Forty-six patients with acute, isolated EC-ICA occlusive stroke were included. Median presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 8 (interquartile range 3–10) with a perfusion deficit in 78.3% of the 40 cases assessed with computed tomography perfusion imaging. Median time from symptom onset to intra-arterial puncture was 14.4 h. Immediate recanalization was achieved in 82.6% cases. Two cases (4.3%) of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) occurred postprocedure. Outcome measures were stable or improved discharge NIHSS score in 86.9% of cases, functional independence at 90 days (modified Rankin scale score ≤2) in 78.3%, and mortality in 6.5%. The systematic review included 167 patients from four articles. The estimated rate of immediate recanalization was 92.7% (95% confidence interval (CI), 88.77–96.77%), favorable outcome was 62.01% (95% CI, 55.04–69.87%), and sICH was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.41–11.32%). Conclusion Stenting and angioplasty for acute cervical ICA occlusive strokes during the hyperacute phase can be performed successfully with favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable recanalization rate.

BACKGROUND: Passive drainage post-surgical evacuation of symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is currently standard of care. High rates of infection, drain occlusion, and recurrence are associated complications. OBJECTIVE: To explore the use of a novel double-lumen active automated irrigation and aspiration system, IRRAflow (IRRAS), for patients with cSDH and compared procedural and clinical outcomes against passive drainage alone with propensity score matching (PSM) and volumetric analysis. METHODS: A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively searched for consecutive patients presenting with cSDH. One-to-one PSM of covariates (including baseline comorbidities and presentation hematoma volume) in active and passive irrigation groups was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias. Rates of hematoma clearance, catheter-related occlusion, and infection; number of revisions; and length of hospital stay were recorded. RESULTS: This study included 55 patients: active continuous irrigation-drainage-21 (21 post-PSM) and passive drainage-34 (21 post-PSM). For PSM groups, a significantly higher rate of hematoma clearance was obtained in the active irrigationdrainage group (0.5 ± 0.4 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 mL/day) and in the passive drainage group; odds ratio (OR) = 1.291 (CI: 1.062-1.570, P = .002) and a significantly lower rate of catheter-related infections (OR = 0.051; CI: 0.004-0.697, P = .039). A nonsignificantly lower hematoma expansion rate at discharge was noted in the active irrigation-drainage group (4.8% vs 23.8%; OR = 0.127; P = .186). No statistical difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality or discharge Glasgow Coma Scale score was observed between groups. CONCLUSION: Active and automated continuous irrigation plus drainage after cSDH surgical evacuation resulted in faster hematoma clearance and led to favorable clinical outcomes and low complication and revision rates compared with passive irrigation.