Background: A variant in steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1, encoded by the gene NR5A1), p.Arg92Trp, has recently been reported in multiple families with 46,XX ovotesticular or testicular disorders of sex development (DSD). This amino acid change impacts the DNA-binding domain and perturbs gonadal differentiation pathways. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing was performed on a 46,XX subject with ovotesticular DSD. Results: Exome results identified a heterozygous NR5A1 variant, p.Arg92Gln, in the 46,XX ovotesticular DSD proband. This arginine-to-glutamine change has been previously reported in the homozygous state in a 46,XY patient with gonadal and adrenal dysgenesis, though 46,XY and 46,XX heterozygous carriers of this variant have not been previously reported to have any clinical phenotype. Conclusions: The NR5A1 p.Arg92Gln variant, which has thus far only been seen in a family with 46,XY DSD, most likely contributes to the ovotesticular DSD in this case. In light of the recent reports of unrelated 46,XX subjects with testicular or ovotesticular DSD with the NR5A1 variant p.Arg92Trp, it appears that other mutations in the DNA binding domain have the potential to impact the factors determining testicular and ovarian differentiation. This case demonstrates the variability of phenotypes with the same genotype and broadens our understanding of the role of SF-1 in gonadal differentiation.

Context The decision whether to treat a child with delayed puberty with sex steroids is primarily based on patient, family, and provider preference. Knowing when children with constitutional delay eventually enter puberty would inform this decision. Objective, Design, Setting, Participants, and Outcome Measures To estimate and compare rates of pubertal entry, we conducted a retrospective cohort study by reviewing medical records of children evaluated for delayed puberty at a large academic medical center between 2000 and 2015, extracting data on pubertal status for all clinical visits, then conducting time-to-event analyses. Results Of 392 girls and 683 boys with delayed puberty, constitutional delay was the most common cause, found in 32% of girls and 70% of boys. In a subcohort of 97 girls and 243 boys who were prepubertal at one or more visits, we observed a broad age range for pubertal entry, up to >16 years for girls and >17 years for boys. The probability of entering puberty within the next year for 12- to 15.5-year-old girls and 13.5- to 16.5-year-old boys with delayed puberty ranged between 38% and 74%. No differences in the rates of pubertal entry were seen between girls and boys after data harmonization. Conclusion The broad range of ages at pubertal entry for children with constitutional delay challenges the concept that constitutional delay is merely an extreme of normal variation. Discussions with patients and families about management should consider the possibility that some children may need to wait years after presentation until puberty starts.

Background: Undervirilized 46,XY males with bifid scrotum often pose a diagnostic challenge, and the majority of cases typically do not receive a genetic diagnosis. NR5A1 mutations can be seen in 10-20% of the cases and are a relatively common cause of undervirilization. Methods: Whole-exome sequencing was utilized to study 10 undervirilized 46,XY subjects with bifid scrotum. Results: Exome sequencing identified novel NR5A1 variants, both affecting exon 7, in 2 of the 10 subjects with bifid scrotum. Subject 1 had a heterozygous frameshift variant, c.1150delC, p.Leu384fsTer1, within the ligand-binding domain inherited from his unaffected father. Subject 2 had a novel splice-site variant c.1139-2T>C, affecting the canonical splice acceptor site for exon 7 and also disrupting the ligand-binding domain. Both subjects had serum testosterone levels within the normal range as infants. Conclusions: We describe two novel NR5A1 variants, demonstrating mutations in this gene as a common cause of milder cases of 46,XY undervirilization. Whole-exome sequencing results yielded the diagnosis in 2 out of 10 cases without a previous diagnosis, supporting the value of this approach. Significant genotype-phenotype variability was also noted with Subject 1's paternal inheritance from his unaffected father.

Summary Background Bifid scrotum and hypospadias can be signs of undervirilization, yet boys presenting with these findings often do not undergo genetic evaluation. In some cases, identifying an underlying genetic diagnosis can help to optimize clinical care and improve guidance given to patients and families. Objectives The aim of this study was to characterize current practice for genetic evaluation of patients with bifid scrotum, and to identify approaches with a good diagnostic yield. Methods A retrospective study of the Boston Children’s Hospital electronic medical records (1993–2015) was conducted using the search term “bifid scrotum” and clinical data were extracted. Data were abstracted into a REDCap database for analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, SAS, and Excel software. Results The search identified 110 subjects evaluated in the Urology and/or Endocrinology clinics for bifid scrotum. Genetic testing (including karyotype, microarray, or targeted testing) was performed on 64% of the subjects with bifid scrotum; of those tested, 23% (15% of the total cohort of 110 subjects) received a confirmed genetic diagnosis. Karyotype analysis, when performed, led to a diagnosis in 17% of patients. Of the ten instances when androgen receptor gene sequencing was performed, a pathogenic mutation was identified 20% of the time. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the majority of individuals with moderate undervirilization resulting in bifid scrotum do not receive a genetic diagnosis. Over a third of the analyzed subjects did not have any genetic testing, even though karyotype analysis and androgen receptor (AR) sequencing were both relatively high yield for identifying a genetic etiology. Increased utilization of traditional genetic approaches could significantly improve the ability to find a genetic diagnosis.