No abstract

No abstract

Ribonucleic acid sequencing (RNA-seq) identifies and quantifies RNA molecules from a biological sample. Transformation from raw sequencing data to meaningful gene or isoform counts requires an in silico bioinformatics pipeline. Such pipelines are modular in nature, built using selected software and biological references. Software is usually chosen and parameterized according to the sequencing protocol and biological question. However, while biological and technical noise is alleviated through replicates, biases due to the pipeline and choice of biological references are often overlooked. Here, we show that the current standard practice prevents reproducibility in RNA-seq studies by failing to specify required methodological information. Peer-reviewed articles are intended to apply currently accepted scientific and methodological standards. Inasmuch as the bias-less and optimal RNA-seq pipeline is not perfectly defined, methodological information holds a meaningful role in defining the results. This work illustrates the need for a standardized and explicit display of methodological information in RNA-seq experiments.

In this study, fiber-reinforced microcellular foams are produced via injection molding and studied as a function of mold temperature as well as wood, blowing agent, and coupling agent concentrations. Birch wood fibers are added to a post-consumer recycled HDPE/PP matrix (85: 15 ratio) in proportions ranging from 0 to 40 wt% and then foamed. Maleic-anhydride-polypropylene copolymer (MAPP) is also used as a coupling agent in proportions ranging from 0 to 10 wt% of wood content. In this first part, the morphological analysis of composite foams is presented including cell roundness, cell size, skin thickness, void fraction, and fiber aspect ratio.

No abstract