AimTo assess lower extremity decompression nerve surgery (DNS) to treat the consequences of diabetic distal symmetric peripheral neuropathy (DPN).Research design and methodsMEDLINE, PubMed, and related registries were searched through December 2017 to identify randomized, quasi-randomized or observational trials that evaluated the efficacy of lower extremity DNS on pain relief (primary outcome) or other secondary outcomes. Observational studies were included, given investigators’ reluctance to use sham surgery controls. Outcome effect size was estimated, and a weighted average was calculated.ResultsEight of 23 studies evaluated pain relief, including a double-blind randomized controlled trial (with a sham surgery leg), an unblinded trial with a nonsurgical control leg, and 6 observational studies. All reported substantial pain relief post-DNS with average effect sizes between two and five. Unexpectedly, the double-blind trial showed improvement in the sham leg comparable to the DNS leg and exceeding the improvement observed in the nonsurgical leg in the unblinded study. Sensory testing showed generally favorable results supporting DNS, and nerve conduction velocities increased post-DNS relative to deterioration in controls. Ultrasound revealed fusiform nerve swelling near compression sites. Morphological results of DNS were generally favorable but inconsistent, whereas hemodynamic measures showed a positive effect on arterial parameters, as did transcutaneous oximetry (improved microcirculation). The incidence of initial and recurrent neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers appeared reduced post-DNS relative to the contralateral foot (borderline significant).ConclusionThe data remain insufficient to recommend DNS for painful DPN, given conflicting and unexpectedly positive results involving sham surgery relative to unblinded controls. The generally supportive sensory and nerve conduction results are compromised by methodological issues, whereas more favorable results support DNS to prevent new or recurrent neuropathic foot ulcers. Future studies need to clarify subject selection vis-à-vis DPN vs superimposed compressed nerves, utilize appropriate validated instruments, and readdress use of sham surgical controls in light of recent results.

The number of commercially available, evidence-based therapeutic monoclonal antibodies continues to expand. In oncology, immune checkpoint inhibitors are particularly important, as a wide range of central and peripheral nervous system complications are described. In rheumatology, anti-TNF alpha drugs remain associated with demyelinating syndromes. The number of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies encountered in practice continues to grow, as does the number of described neurological complications. Recognition of a possible drug complication is key, as these are typically complex patients at risk of other causes of neurological injury. Identification of a complication of therapy often leads to intervention and a change in management.

No abstract

Our study indicates that sustained hyperglycemia is related to functional changes, at the minimum, in peripheral sensory and motor nerve conduction at a diabetes duration of 4 years. Our findings are consistent with a dying-back neuropathy, and there is some suggestion that chronic hyperglycemia may be more detrimental to nerves in male subjects than in female subjects.

Diabetic amyotrophy is a rare complication of diabetes compared to distal symmetric polyneuropathy, but can occasionally be encountered in clinical practice, particularly as the incidence of diabetes increases. The distinctive history of unilateral neuropathic symptoms followed rapidly by atrophy and weakness is typical of the disorder. This complication most commonly occurs in cases of well-controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus. While the underlying pathophysiology is known to be microvasculitic in nature, the diagnosis is often based on clinical and electrodiagnostic grounds and tissue biopsy is not typically performed. Attempts at corticosteroid administration during immunotherapy should be carefully considered on a patient-by-patient basis. Better recognition of this disorder is likely to result in more rapid diagnosis, counselling, and subspecialty referral.